IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v77y2025ipbs0275531925002582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty or investor attention: Which has more impact on Bitcoin volatility?

Author

Listed:
  • Aras, Serkan
  • Özdemir, Mehmet Ozan
  • Çılgın, Cihan

Abstract

The growing popularity of web-based indices has increased interest in their application for forecasting Bitcoin volatility. This study examines the individual and combined impacts of investor attention indices, such as the Google Trends Cryptocurrency Attention (GTCA) index, and uncertainty indices, including GEPU, GPR, and WUI, on Bitcoin price fluctuations using a GARCH-MIDAS model. Our findings reveal that attention indices, particularly GTCA, are more significant predictors of Bitcoin volatility than uncertainty indices. Moreover, models that combine GTCA with uncertainty indices improve explanatory power and out-of-sample forecast accuracy. These results underscore the importance of integrating diverse data sources for better volatility forecasting, providing valuable insights for investors and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Aras, Serkan & Özdemir, Mehmet Ozan & Çılgın, Cihan, 2025. "Uncertainty or investor attention: Which has more impact on Bitcoin volatility?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:77:y:2025:i:pb:s0275531925002582
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925002582
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:77:y:2025:i:pb:s0275531925002582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.