IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v77y2025ipbs0275531925002399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do ESG-conscious fund managers drive green innovation? An LLM-based textual analysis of fund manager narratives

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yi
  • Liu, Tong
  • Wang, Zhaohua

Abstract

As ESG considerations gain increasing prominence, investors’ preferences for ESG factors are evolving, potentially influencing corporate governance practices. This study examines how fund managers’ ESG preferences affect the green innovation efforts of the firms they hold. Using large language models (LLMs) to analyze fund managers’ discussions in the quarterly reports of China’s mutual funds, we find that firms held by fund managers with stronger ESG preferences tend to demonstrate better green innovation performance. The positive impact of ESG-conscious fund managers on green innovation is primarily driven by increased R&D expenditures, the hiring of additional R&D personnel, and the alleviation of financing constraints. Additionally, the strength of this effect varies with factors such as analyst coverage, environmental performance, corporate governance structures of the firms, and the consistency of fund managers’ ESG preferences. This research not only highlights the utility of LLMs in corporate finance studies but also offers valuable insights into the role of fund managers’ personal preferences in shaping corporate governance and innovation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yi & Liu, Tong & Wang, Zhaohua, 2025. "Do ESG-conscious fund managers drive green innovation? An LLM-based textual analysis of fund manager narratives," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:77:y:2025:i:pb:s0275531925002399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925002399
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:77:y:2025:i:pb:s0275531925002399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.