IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v109y2026ics1059056026005496.html

AI for financial fraud detection: Empirical evidence from benchmarking deep learning architectures to case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Leeroy, Wesley
  • Leeroy, Gordon C.
  • Lee, Eugene

Abstract

Financial statement fraud poses a significant threat to market integrity, but its detection across different institutional environments remains a major challenge. This study develops and validates a deep learning framework for cross-context financial fraud detection, leveraging a novel dataset of confirmed cases in Germany and a purposive sample of high-risk firms in Brazil. Our empirical investigation proceeds in two parts. First, we conduct a systematic benchmark of three neural network architectures—Feed-forward Neural Network (MLP), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs)—trained on six key financial ratios from 2778 company-year observations. By learning from sequential financial data, the AI model directly addresses the fundamental problem of information asymmetry between corporate insiders and external stakeholders. The sequential GRU model demonstrated clear superiority, achieving a 94.3% Area Under the Curve (AUC) in the German market and maintaining robust performance with an 89.7% AUC in the high-risk Brazilian context. Second, a detailed case study analysis reveals a stark contrast in fraud prevalence and patterns: a 3.6% rate characterized by subtle, multi-year manipulation in Germany, versus a 41.7% probability marked by acute financial distress in the Brazilian sample. A key finding unifying both parts is the identification of the “profitability-efficiency mismatch"—a systematic divergence between accrual-based earnings and cash flow—as a primary, universal fraud signature. These findings provide regulators and auditors with a powerful, interpretable tool for proactive risk assessment and underscore the critical need for context-specific detection strategies in global markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Leeroy, Wesley & Leeroy, Gordon C. & Lee, Eugene, 2026. "AI for financial fraud detection: Empirical evidence from benchmarking deep learning architectures to case studies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:109:y:2026:i:c:s1059056026005496
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2026.105436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056026005496
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2026.105436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:109:y:2026:i:c:s1059056026005496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.