IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v109y2026ics1059056026005149.html

Climate policy uncertainty and asset–liability maturity mismatch

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Min
  • Wu, Saijun
  • Fan, Yuqiong
  • Meng, Ling

Abstract

The increasing frequency and ambiguity of climate policy changes have raised concerns about their unintended consequences on corporate financial decisions. This study examines how climate policy uncertainty (CPU) foments corporate asset–liability maturity mismatch by examining its influence on short-term debt for long-term investment (SLLI). Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese firms spanning 2009–2024, this article employs a multiple linear regression model based on the climate uncertainty index at the urban level to analyze the impact of CPU on SLLI. The results show that CPU significantly increases firms’ tendency toward SLLI. Further mechanism analyses indicate that CPU primarily affects SLLI practices by shortening corporate debt maturity and tightening financing constraints. Notably, the impact of CPU is particularly pronounced for non-state-owned enterprises, high-polluting firms, firms operating in low-market-concentration industries, and larger firms but is insignificant for other firm types. This study provides valuable insights for firms and policymakers to develop strategies and support mechanisms to address the challenges posed by CPU.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Min & Wu, Saijun & Fan, Yuqiong & Meng, Ling, 2026. "Climate policy uncertainty and asset–liability maturity mismatch," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:109:y:2026:i:c:s1059056026005149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2026.105401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056026005149
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2026.105401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:109:y:2026:i:c:s1059056026005149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.