IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v104y2025ics1059056025009487.html

Do peer narrative disclosures support or disrupt efficient investment?

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Renhui
  • Gao, Fang
  • Ma, Chen

Abstract

This study examines whether and how the information content of peer firms' narrative disclosures, captured by the vertical textual similarity (VTS) of peers' MD&As, affects corporate investment efficiency, using data from publicly listed firms in China. We find that lower VTS in peers' MD&As is associated with richer industry-specific information and greater investment efficiency. Importantly, this effect is not driven by the tone of the disclosures. Instead, it operates through two main channels: improved firm transparency and enhanced external monitoring. The effect is more pronounced when disclosures are timelier, the text is more readable, and the competitive or macroeconomic environment is more uncertain. We further show that managers and investors actively incorporate information from peer MD&As into their investment decisions, particularly during periods of industry transition. Notably, peers' MD&As tend to emphasize positive news, which exerts a stronger influence on investment efficiency than negative news. Collectively, our findings reveal a positive spillover effect of MD&A textual disclosures across firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Renhui & Gao, Fang & Ma, Chen, 2025. "Do peer narrative disclosures support or disrupt efficient investment?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025009487
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025009487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025009487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.