Author
Listed:
- Khan, Ifran
- Gui, Huangbao
- Chui, Chin Man
- Faryal, Mrs
- Hsiao, Cody Yu-Ling
- Chen, Ziqi
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamic volatility transmission between leading cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance Coin) and major Chinese firms in the technology (Tencent and Alibaba), green energy (CATL, BYD, and LONGi), and traditional energy (PetroChina) sectors, including the CSI 300 index. Employing the frameworks of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (2018) on daily data from July 2018 to May 2025, we demonstrate significant cross-market risk transmission. The total connectedness index averages 34.77 %, soaring to over 50 % during the COVID-19 crisis, underscoring heightened systemic vulnerability. Our key finding identifies the CSI 300 index and cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH) as the primary net transmitters of volatility shocks, whereas Chinese tech and energy firms (Tencent, CATL, and PetroChina) act as the main net receivers. A critical insight from the frequency decomposition is the absolute dominance of short-term spillovers (1–4 days), which constitute 34.85 % of total connectedness, vastly outweighing the minimal effects in the medium- (4–10 days: 0.78 %) and long-term (beyond 10 days: 0.52 %). Investor sentiment, speculation, and news shocks drive short-term volatility spillovers from cryptocurrencies to stocks, particularly evident in their strong correlation with Chinese tech and energy equities. We attribute these spillovers to shared investor bases, sectoral links like crypto mining's energy demand, and regulatory interdependencies. Our evidence confirms that cryptocurrency markets are now integral to global financial stress, transmitting significant volatility to real-economy sectors. This study offers critical insights for investors and policymakers managing risk in an increasingly interconnected financial landscape.
Suggested Citation
Khan, Ifran & Gui, Huangbao & Chui, Chin Man & Faryal, Mrs & Hsiao, Cody Yu-Ling & Chen, Ziqi, 2025.
"Bridging finance and the real economy: Dynamic volatility transmission between leading cryptocurrencies and Chinese firms,"
International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025008512
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104688
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025008512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.