IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v104y2025ics1059056025007932.html

Artificial intelligence policy uncertainty and corporate Greenwashing: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Gan, Yufei
  • Pi, Luxueting

Abstract

While the economic consequences of general policy uncertainty are well-documented, little is known about how uncertainty surrounding the governance of transformative technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) shapes corporate non-market strategies. This study investigates whether and how AI Policy Uncertainty (AIPU) drives corporate greenwashing. Using a large panel of Chinese listed firms from 2010–Q1 2025 and a novel text-based index of AIPU, we establish a causal link through a multi-pronged identification strategy that includes Propensity Score Matching (PSM), a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) design, and an Instrumental Variable (IV) analysis. We find robust evidence that AIPU significantly increases corporate greenwashing. Crucially, this effect is attenuated for firms led by CEOs with strong IT backgrounds, who can better navigate technological turbulence. We further unveil the micro-foundations of this effect, showing that AIPU fuels greenwashing through three distinct mediating pathways: splitting managerial attention toward external risks (a cognitive channel), increasing precautionary cash holdings (a financial channel), and directly inhibiting substantive green innovation (a strategic channel). Heterogeneity analysis also shows the effect is more pronounced for non-state-owned enterprises and non-high-tech firms. Our findings reveal an important unintended consequence of technology governance and offer crucial insights for managers, investors, and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gan, Yufei & Pi, Luxueting, 2025. "Artificial intelligence policy uncertainty and corporate Greenwashing: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025007932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025007932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025007932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.