Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Ningning
- Wang, Yawen
Abstract
In response to the growing global demand for sustainable development, this study investigates how executive incentive structures shape corporate green behavior in Chinese listed firms. We distinguish among three types of incentives: monetary, equity-based, and consumption-related. Empirical results indicate that performance-driven monetary and equity incentives significantly enhance firms’ environmental engagement. Monetary incentives promote green behavior primarily through improving information transparency and investment efficiency, while equity-based incentives work by reinforcing long-term value orientation and optimizing capital allocation. In contrast, consumption-related incentives substantially hinder green behavior, mainly by weakening managerial sentiment and crowding out resources for environmental initiatives. Further evidence shows that analyst attention amplifies the positive effects of performance-oriented incentives and partially mitigates the negative impacts of consumption-oriented ones. These findings are robust across multiple specifications, including lagged variables, propensity score matching, Heckman correction, and the inclusion of province-year and industry-year fixed effects. The study contributes theoretically by advancing principal–agent theory in the sustainability context and clarifying the mechanisms linking executive compensation to environmental outcomes. Practically, it provides evidence to inform the design of green compensation packages and offers regulatory insights for strengthening environmental disclosure requirements. While grounded in the Chinese context, the findings carry global relevance, offering valuable implications for emerging markets and advanced economies alike in promoting corporate green transformation.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Ningning & Wang, Yawen, 2025.
"How to shape corporate green behavior? — The green governance effect of executive incentive strategies,"
International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025007750
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104612
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:104:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025007750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.