IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v103y2025ics1059056025006549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can digital inclusive finance suppress energy ecological footprint? moderated mediation effect test based on technological innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Mianhao
  • Li, Yiling
  • Xiong, Wenqi
  • Yuan, Juhong

Abstract

Within the context of energy conservation, emission reduction, and the development of digital inclusion financial (DIF), this study explores the relationship between DIF and the energy ecological footprint (EEF). Using panel data from 30 provinces in China spanning 2011 to 2021, it employs a moderated mediation effect model to empirically analyze the mechanisms through which DIF affects the EEF. The findings reveal that DIF can mitigate the growth of the EEF. Specifically, it achieves this by promoting industrial structure upgrading, which in turn curbs EEF expansion. Furthermore, technological innovation enhances the positive impact of DIF on industrial structure upgrading, thereby amplifying the suppressive effect of industrial transformation on the EEF. Additional analysis highlights that regional difference—such as government digital governance capacity, environmental and financial regulations, digital infrastructure development, and digital usage—significantly influence the extent to which DIF inhibits EEF growth. The study also finds that DIF not only fosters economic inclusiveness but also demonstrates an energy ecological inclusiveness effect. Its marginal utility is particularly pronounced in regions with lower economic development and higher EEF. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the theoretical linkage between DIF and the EEF. It also provides valuable references and decision-making insights for leveraging DIF to enhance energy efficiency and support the achievement of the “dual-carbon” goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Mianhao & Li, Yiling & Xiong, Wenqi & Yuan, Juhong, 2025. "Can digital inclusive finance suppress energy ecological footprint? moderated mediation effect test based on technological innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025006549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025006549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025006549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.