IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v102y2025ics1059056025005271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which assets are safe havens? Evidence from 13 stock market downturns

Author

Listed:
  • Cheema, Muhammad A.
  • Ryan, Michael
  • Sarwar, Sirajum Munira

Abstract

This study investigates the safe haven (SH) efficacy of 11 assets against 13 stock market downturns, utilizing data from the MSCI World Index, MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and stock indices of the five largest economies. Our comprehensive analysis reduces the likelihood that identified SHs reflect the idiosyncrasies of specific events or markets, enabling us to systematically document which assets serve as SHs in particular types of crises. Our findings reveal three key insights. First, the effectiveness of SH assets varies depending on the nature of the downturn. Government bonds tend to be effective SHs during downturns triggered by macroeconomic or financial market events, as these downturns are typically associated with lower inflation and interest rates. Conversely, geopolitical conflicts often diminish the SH properties of government bonds. Second, the geographical and financial proximity of the SH asset to the source of the downturn affects its efficacy. Assets from countries directly involved in or closely connected to the crisis are less likely to serve as SHs. Third, Japan's minimal involvement in geopolitical conflicts has established the Japanese Yen and Japanese government bonds as the most reliable SHs during such conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheema, Muhammad A. & Ryan, Michael & Sarwar, Sirajum Munira, 2025. "Which assets are safe havens? Evidence from 13 stock market downturns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.