IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v102y2025ics1059056025004940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from China's unified management of local courts reform

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yanqi
  • Ke, Jinjun
  • Chen, Aihua
  • Cai, Xiang

Abstract

This study examines how judicial independence influences corporate innovation, using the staggered implementation of China's unified management of local courts (UMLC) reform as a natural experiment. Employing data from Chinese listed companies between 2008 and 2020, we find that the UMLC significantly boosts corporate innovation and patent citation by 7.358 % and 0.803 %. This positive relationship is primarily driven by reduced local judicial protectionism, improved access to external financing, and enhanced corporate governance. Our results further reveal that the innovation-enhancing effects of judicial reform are stronger in areas with high political intervention, weaker institutional environments, and among firms without political connections. This research highlights the crucial role of judicial independence in fostering corporate innovation, providing policymakers with valuable insights into the benefits of judicial reforms in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yanqi & Ke, Jinjun & Chen, Aihua & Cai, Xiang, 2025. "Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from China's unified management of local courts reform," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025004940
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025004940
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025004940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.