IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v101y2025ics1059056025003557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-executive employee stock ownership plan and auditor reporting conservatism: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Yadong
  • Zhou, Ruixue

Abstract

There is not a consistent conclusion on whether non-executive employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) plays a positive role in corporate operation. Previous studies mainly investigate this question from an internal perspective within the firm by examining the economic consequences of non-executive ESOP. Our study intends to provide new evidence from the perspective of an important external party: the auditors. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms over the period of 2014–2021, we find that non-executive ESOP negatively affects auditor reporting conservatism. In other words, auditors are more likely to give clean opinions to firms with non-executive ESOP. This effect is more pronounced when more non-executive employees are involved, when managers have strong incentives to take risk in financial reporting, and for firms with higher degree of information asymmetry. We further find that the underlying mechanisms is that non-executive ESOP improves a firm's financial reporting quality, presented as less earnings management, restatements and frauds, thus reducing audit risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Yadong & Zhou, Ruixue, 2025. "Non-executive employee stock ownership plan and auditor reporting conservatism: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025003557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025003557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Non-executive employee stock ownership plan; Auditor reporting conservatism; Audit risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025003557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.