IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v112y2025ics0739885925000927.html

Sexual harassment and its effects on transport mode choice: An analysis with a gender perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Valenzuela, Berenice
  • Galilea, Patricia
  • Raveau, Sebastián

Abstract

The perception of unsafety, along with other factors, can significantly influence mobility decisions, including the choice of public transport modes. Women feel more unsafe than men. Despite this, most infrastructure and transport services have historically ignored the differing needs of men and women. However, it is important to study gender differences for effective transport planning and to provide a safe system that is not a disadvantage for any group of people. This study aims to analyse the factors associated with the perception of unsafety and how it impacts the choice of public transport modes. It focuses on gender differences, using Santiago, Chile, as a case study. Mode choice data was collected through a revealed preferences survey, with which a hybrid discrete choice model was estimated, incorporating a latent variable termed “unease,” combining unsafety and discomfort elements. Results show that women, especially younger ones, experience a higher perception of unsafety and discomfort, which intensifies when they live in a district with high rates of assault. As a result, people with a greater perception of unease tend to prefer the subway, either exclusively or in combination with the bus, instead of using only the bus. Additionally, it was observed that occasional users are more sensitive to bus waiting times. The study highlights the need for public policies and suggests measures to address these concerns to promote safer, more sustainable, and equitable mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Valenzuela, Berenice & Galilea, Patricia & Raveau, Sebastián, 2025. "Sexual harassment and its effects on transport mode choice: An analysis with a gender perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000927
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Contreras, Hugo Alejandro & Candia, Cristian & Olchevskaia, Rodrigo Vladislav Troncoso & Ferres, Leo & Celedón, María Loreto Bravo & Lepri, Bruno & Rodriguez-Sickert, Carlos, 2023. "Linking Physical Violence to Women's Mobility in Chile," SocArXiv uad59, Center for Open Science.
    2. Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke & Uwe Kunert & Heike Link & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2017. "About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 475-493, May.
    3. Hensher, David A., 2007. "Sustainable public transport systems: Moving towards a value for money and network-based approach and away from blind commitment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 98-102, January.
    4. Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & de Grange, Louis, 2011. "A topological route choice model for metro," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-147, February.
    5. Iglesias, Vicente & Raveau, Sebastián, 2024. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on crowding aversion in public transport and transport mode choice: The case of Santiago, Chile," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 167-174.
    6. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, August.
    7. Noor, Shamim & Iamtrakul, Pawinee, 2023. "Women's access to urban public transport: Toward addressing policy constraints in combating sexual harassment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 14-22.
    8. Paula Iglesias & Margarita Greene & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2013. "On the perception of safety in low income neighbourhoods: using digital images in a stated choice experiment," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Choice Modelling, chapter 9, pages 193-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:uad59_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Laetitia Gauvin & Michele Tizzoni & Simone Piaggesi & Andrew Young & Natalia Adler & Stefaan Verhulst & Leo Ferres & Ciro Cattuto, 2020. "Gender gaps in urban mobility," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Quinones, Lina Marcela, 2020. "Sexual harassment in public transport in Bogotá," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 54-69.
    12. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Cats, Oded, 2019. "The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 83-93.
    13. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali & Daniel J. Graham & Alexander Barron & Mark Trompet, 2020. "Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 737-769, June.
    14. Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Lucas, Karen & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2020. "Understanding accessibility through public transport users' experiences: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Nihan Akyelken, 2013. "Development and Gendered Mobilities: Narratives from the Women of Mardin, Turkey," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 424-439, September.
    16. E. E. Osuna & G. F. Newell, 1972. "Control Strategies for an Idealized Public Transportation System," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 52-72, February.
    17. Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Guerrero B., Thomas E. & Sagaris, Lake, 2024. "Uncovering gender-based violence and harassment in public transport: Lessons for spatial and transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Jaime Soza-Parra & Sebastián Raveau & Juan Carlos Muñoz, 2022. "Public transport reliability across preferences, modes, and space," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 621-640, April.
    19. Carolyn Whitzman, 2007. "Stuck at the Front Door: Gender, Fear of Crime and the Challenge of Creating Safer Space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2715-2732, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ke & Yao, Dongmin & Pei, Mingyang, 2025. "What factors influence Chinese Women's nighttime ride-hailing preferences? An ICLV model analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Soltani, Ali & Qadikolaei, Mohsen Roohani & Pojani, Dorina & Moeini, Marjaneh & Abdekhoda, Kamyar, 2025. "Women’s perceived safety in public transport: Insights from the Middle East," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Raveau, Sebastián & Soza-Parra, Jaime, 2025. "Inertia and shock effects in public transport: The case of metro line 6 in Santiago using smart card data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Bernadeta Gołębiowska & Anna Bartczak & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "Energy Demand Management and Social Norms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Bascuñán, Raúl & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio & Salata, Andrés, 2021. "Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 153-169.
    6. Antón-González, Laura & Pellicer-Chenoll, Maite & García-Massó, Xavier & Devís-Devís, José & González, Luis-Millán, 2026. "Street harassment during active transport: A geolocation perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Bickel, Julia & Geržinič, Nejc & van Oort, Niels & de Bruyn, Menno & Molin, Eric, 2026. "Heterogeneity in route choice behaviour during unplanned train disruptions considering the possibility of teleworking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Andani, I Gusti Ayu & La Paix Puello, Lissy & Geurs, Karst, 2021. "Modelling effects of changes in travel time and costs of toll road usage on choices for residential location, route and travel mode across population segments in the Jakarta-Bandung region, Indonesia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 81-102.
    9. Faccioli, Michela & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Glenk, Klaus & Martin-Ortega, Julia, 2020. "Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Borker, Girija, 2024. "Understanding the constraints to women’s use of urban public transport in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Louis Grange & Felipe González & Ignacio Vargas & Rodrigo Troncoso, 2015. "A Logit Model With Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Network Externalities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 89-116, March.
    12. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Garrido-Valenzuela, Francisco, 2025. "Computer vision-enriched discrete choice models, with an application to residential location choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Jaime Soza-Parra & Sebastián Raveau & Juan Carlos Muñoz, 2022. "Public transport reliability across preferences, modes, and space," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 621-640, April.
    14. Dea van Lierop & Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke, 2023. "Commuting to the future: Assessing the relationship between individuals’ usage of information and communications technology, personal attitudes, characteristics and mode choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 353-371, June.
    15. Luis Márquez & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2020. "Assessing the influence of indicators’ complexity on hybrid discrete choice model estimates," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 373-396, February.
    16. Loa, Patrick & Hossain, Sanjana & Liu, Yicong & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2022. "How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the use of ride-sourcing services? An empirical evidence-based investigation for the Greater Toronto Area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 46-62.
    17. Ching-Fu Chen & Chiang Fu & Ming-Cheng Yen, 2025. "Friend or foe? Exploring the choice preference between E-moped sharing and public transport: an integrated heteroskedastic generalized choice and latent variable (IHGLV) approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2281-2310, December.
    18. Shr, Yau-Huo (Jimmy) & Ready, Richard & Orland, Brian & Echols, Stuart, 2019. "How Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 375-386.
    19. Muneeza Mehmood Alam & Nato Kurshitashvili & Karla Dominguez Gonzalez & Karla Gonzalez Carvajal & Bipasha Baruah, 2022. "Is a Mile for One a Mile for All?," World Bank Publications - Reports 37354, The World Bank Group.
    20. Morlotti, Chiara & Birolini, Sebastian & Malighetti, Paolo & Redondi, Renato, 2023. "A latent class approach to estimate air travelers’ propensity toward connecting itineraries," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.