IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v111y2025ics0739885925000393.html

Modeling the brand choice behavior of shared micro-mobility users: A case of electric scooter sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Chien, Yu-Shyun
  • Lu, Chung-Cheng

Abstract

The growing number of shared micro-mobility service providers coexisting in the market has diversified the market composition, leading to challenges in expanding their own-brand market share. Therefore, developing effective strategies for competition and marketing requires a deeper understanding of users' choice behavior among heterogeneous service providers. However, most previous studies often overlook the heterogeneity among service providers, resulting in limitations in precisely explaining users' choice behavior. To address this research gap, a hybrid choice modeling approach is employed to explore the brand choice behavior within the same transport service. The proposed brand choice model integrates various latent variables, such as brand attitude and shared micro-mobility usage characteristics, to capture the key factors influencing users' service provider choices. Using electric scooter sharing (ESS) as a case study, stated preference data were collected to analyze the choice behavior of ESS users. The results show that travel attributes, latent variables, and socioeconomic characteristics have significant direct effects on choice probability, whereas brand attitude has substantial mediation effects, revealing the importance of brand evaluation on users' choice behavior. The managerial insights derived will enhance the competitive and marketing strategies of ESS service providers, while the policy implications will provide direction for government planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Modeling the brand choice behavior of shared micro-mobility users: A case of electric scooter sharing," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000393
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scorrano, Mariangela & Rotaris, Lucia, 2022. "The role of environmental awareness and knowledge in the choice of a seated electric scooter," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 333-347.
    2. Liu, Hung-Chi & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2022. "Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-119.
    3. Zhou, Min & Long, Piao & Kong, Nan & Zhao, Lindu & Jia, Fu & Campy, Kathryn S., 2021. "Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 134-152.
    4. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cohen, Adam & Chan, Nelson & Bansal, Apaar, 2020. "Chapter 13 - Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0z9711dw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong & Ngo, Thanh & Gilbey, Andrew & Avis, Mark, 2019. "Airline brand choice in a duopolistic market: The case of New Zealand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 147-163.
    6. Gupta, Akshay & Bivina, G.R. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Does neighborhood design matter for walk access to metro stations? An integrated SEM-Hybrid discrete mode choice approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-77.
    7. Nikiforiadis, Andreas & Paschalidis, Evangelos & Stamatiadis, Nikiforos & Paloka, Ntonata & Tsekoura, Eleni & Basbas, Socrates, 2023. "E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Shang-Yu Chen & Chung-Cheng Lu, 2016. "A Model of Green Acceptance and Intentions to Use Bike-Sharing: YouBike Users in Taiwan," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1103-1124, December.
    9. Ben-Akiva, Moshe & McFadden, Daniel & Train, Kenneth & Börsch-Supan, Axel, 2002. "Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 02-29, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    10. Kim, Jinhee & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2014. "Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 71-85.
    11. Giansoldati, Marco & Rotaris, Lucia & Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo, 2020. "Does electric car knowledge influence car choice? Evidence from a hybrid choice model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Hess, Stephane & Spitz, Greg & Bradley, Mark & Coogan, Matt, 2018. "Analysis of mode choice for intercity travel: Application of a hybrid choice model to two distinct US corridors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 547-567.
    13. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson & Bansal, Apaar & Cohen, Adam, 2015. "Shared Mobility: A Sustainability & Technologies Workshop: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2f61q30s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    15. McKenzie, Grant, 2019. "Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-28.
    16. MacKenzie, Scott B & Spreng, Richard A, 1992. "How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(4), pages 519-529, March.
    17. Aarhaug, Jørgen & Fearnley, Nils & Hartveit, Knut Johannes Liland & Johnsson, Espen, 2023. "Price and competition in emerging shared e-scooter markets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Samadzad, Mahdi & Nosratzadeh, Hossein & Karami, Hossein & Karami, Ali, 2023. "What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user's perspective?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 70-82.
    19. repec:xrs:meawpa:02009 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Guzman, Luis A. & Arellana, Julian & Camargo, José Pablo, 2021. "A hybrid discrete choice model to understand the effect of public policy on fare evasion discouragement in Bogotá's Bus Rapid Transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 140-153.
    21. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    22. Jung, Se-Yeon & Yoo, Kwang-Eui, 2016. "A study on passengers' airport choice behavior using hybrid choice model: A case study of Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 70-79.
    23. Huang, Yung-Chuan, 2022. "How marketing strategy, perceived value and brand image influence WOM outcomes—The sharing economy perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    24. Daly, Andrew & Hess, Stephane & de Jong, Gerard, 2012. "Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modelling estimates," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 333-341.
    25. Motoaki, Yutaka & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2015. "A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 217-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    2. Scorrano, Mariangela & Mathisen, Terje Andreas & Danielis, Romeo & Simsekoglu, Ozlem & Marinelli, Giuseppe, 2026. "Stated car choices in Norway and Italy: a comparison based on the integrated choice and latent variable model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    4. Rotaris, Lucia & Giansoldati, Marco & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2021. "The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Cai, Yangqian & Moreno, Ana Tsui, 2024. "Identifying non-universal heterogeneity of preferences of leisure cyclists for rural highway environments: A latent-class model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Iogansen, Xiatian & Wang, Kailai & Bunch, David & Matson, Grant & Circella, Giovanni, 2023. "Deciphering the factors associated with adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in California: An investigation of latent attitudes, socio-demographics, and neighborhood effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Gustavo García-Melero & Rubén Sainz-González & Pablo Coto-Millán & Alejandra Valencia-Vásquez, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility Policy Analysis Using Hybrid Choice Models: Is It the Right Choice?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    9. Fangqing Song & Stephane Hess & Thijs Dekker, 2024. "Uncovering the link between intra-individual heterogeneity and variety seeking: the case of new shared mobility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 371-406, April.
    10. Masiero, Lorenzo & Hrankai, Richard, 2022. "Modeling tourist accessibility to peripheral attractions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Amaya, Johanna & Serrano, Ivan & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián & Pérez, Cinthia C., 2024. "Implications of trust, preparedness, risk perceptions, and local context on deprivation costs and disaster relief planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. John Buckell & David A Hensher & Stephane Hess, 2021. "Kicking the habit is hard: A hybrid choice model investigation into the role of addiction in smoking behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-19, January.
    13. Jia, Wenjian & Chen, T. Donna, 2023. "Investigating heterogeneous preferences for plug-in electric vehicles: Policy implications from different choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Zhang, Hanyuan & Qiu, Richard T.R. & Wen, Long & Song, Haiyan & Liu, Chang, 2023. "Has COVID-19 changed tourist destination choice?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Huang, Yue & Gan, Hongcheng & Postorino, Maria Nadia & Wang, Ke & Wu, Xuelian, 2025. "Young people preferences about enhanced transportation services for intercity trips: An integrated choice and latent variable approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Li, Lixu & Wang, Zhiqiang & Xie, Xiaoqing, 2022. "From government to market? A discrete choice analysis of policy instruments for electric vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 143-159.
    17. Nikiforiadis, Andreas & Paschalidis, Evangelos & Stamatiadis, Nikiforos & Paloka, Ntonata & Tsekoura, Eleni & Basbas, Socrates, 2023. "E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Scorrano, Mariangela & Rotaris, Lucia, 2022. "The role of environmental awareness and knowledge in the choice of a seated electric scooter," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 333-347.
    19. Varameth Vichiensan & Vasinee Wasuntarasook & Sathita Malaitham & Atsushi Fukuda & Wiroj Rujopakarn, 2025. "Willingness to Pay for Station Access Transport: A Mixed Logit Model with Heterogeneous Travel Time Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Alcorta, Peio & Mariel, Petr, 2025. "Beyond biases: Exploring endogeneity in the allocation function of latent class models for environmental valuation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925000393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.