IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v96y2015icp19-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for the evaluation of anthropogenic resources: A landfill mining case study – Resource or reserve?

Author

Listed:
  • Winterstetter, Andrea
  • Laner, David
  • Rechberger, Helmut
  • Fellner, Johann

Abstract

The goal of this study is to apply the natural resource classification framework UNFC-2009 to a landfill-mining project to identify the landfilled materials as potential anthropogenic ‘resources’ (reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction in the foreseeable future) or ‘reserves’ (current economic extraction possible), and to reveal critical factors for the classification of the project. Based on data from a landfill-mining project in Belgium, the focus of the evaluation was set on technological options and economics, with a material flow analysis quantifying relevant material and energy flows and a discounted cash flow analysis including Monte Carlo simulations, exploring the project's socioeconomic viability. Four scenarios have been investigated, representing different alternatives for the combustible waste fraction's thermal treatment (gas-plasma technology vs. incineration) and for specific stakeholder interests (public vs. private perspective). The net present values were found to be negative for all four scenarios, implying that none of the project's variations is currently economically viable. The main drivers of the economic performance are parameters related to the thermal treatment of the combustible waste fraction as well as to the sales of recovered metals. Based on required future price increases for non-ferrous metals or electricity to make the project economically viable, the scenarios resulted in different final resource classifications. Although the applicability of UNFC-2009 to landfill mining has been proven successfully, further research is needed to define generally suitable criteria for categorizing various kinds of anthropogenic resources under UNFC-2009. This will allow for fair comparisons between naturally occurring and anthropogenic resource deposits.

Suggested Citation

  • Winterstetter, Andrea & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Fellner, Johann, 2015. "Framework for the evaluation of anthropogenic resources: A landfill mining case study – Resource or reserve?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 19-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:96:y:2015:i:c:p:19-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915000051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maheshi, Danthurebandara & Steven, Van Passel & Karel, Van Acker, 2015. "Environmental and economic assessment of ‘open waste dump’ mining in Sri Lanka," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 67-79.
    2. Burlakovs, Juris & Kriipsalu, Mait & Klavins, Maris & Bhatnagar, Amit & Vincevica-Gaile, Zane & Stenis, Jan & Jani, Yahya & Mykhaylenko, Valeriy & Denafas, Gintaras & Turkadze, Tsitsino & Hogland, Mar, 2017. "Paradigms on landfill mining: From dump site scavenging to ecosystem services revitalization," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-84.
    3. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:96:y:2015:i:c:p:19-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.