IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reacre/v28y2016i1p22-41.html

Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2014 academic literature

Author

Listed:
  • Kozloski, Thomas
  • Meckfessel, Michele
  • Moehrle, Stephen R.
  • Williams, Thomas

Abstract

In this article, we synthesize, in annotated bibliography form, recent regulation-related findings and commentaries in the academic literature. This annotated bibliography is one in a series of bibliographies that summarizes regulation-related academic research. We reviewed articles published in The Accounting Review, Journal of Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Contemporary Accounting Research, Accounting Horizons, The Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, and Research in Accounting Regulation. We annotate results of regulation-related research studies and key points from regulation-related commentaries. The literature featured some strong regulation-related threads in 2014 including the foundations of financial reporting, international financial reporting standards, retrospectives on Sarbanes-Oxley and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ten years out, corporate governance and audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Kozloski, Thomas & Meckfessel, Michele & Moehrle, Stephen R. & Williams, Thomas, 2016. "Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2014 academic literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 22-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:22-41
    DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045716000047
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.racreg.2016.03.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Lee & Norman Strong & Zhenmei (Judy) Zhu, 2014. "Did Regulation Fair Disclosure, SOX, and Other Analyst Regulations Reduce Security Mispricing?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 52(3), pages 733-774, June.
    2. Li, Xi, 2014. "The Sarbanes–Oxley act and cross-listed foreign private issuers," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 21-40.
    3. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.
    4. S.P. Kothari & Karthik Ramanna & Douglas J. Skinner, 2009. "Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of Positive Research in Accounting," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-137, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2010.
    5. Mark L. DeFond & K. Raghunandan & K.R. Subramanyam, 2002. "Do Non–Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1247-1274, September.
    6. Gwen Yu & Aida Sijamic Wahid, 2014. "Accounting Standards and International Portfolio Holdings," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-059, Harvard Business School.
    7. Clare Wang, 2014. "Accounting Standards Harmonization and Financial Statement Comparability: Evidence from Transnational Information Transfer," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 52(4), pages 955-992, September.
    8. Chan Li, 2009. "Does Client Importance Affect Auditor Independence at the Office Level? Empirical Evidence from Going†Concern Opinions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 201-230, March.
    9. Correia, Maria M., 2014. "Political connections and SEC enforcement," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 241-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Kareen E. & Elayan, Fayez A. & Li, Jingyu & Mohammad, Emad & Pacharn, Parunchana & Liu, Zhefeng Frank, 2016. "To exempt or not to exempt non-accelerated filers from compliance with the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 86-95.
    2. Oleh Pasko, 2018. "Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 37-46, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Minnis & Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 473-502, July.
    2. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske & Christoph J. Sextroh, 2020. "Why Do Politicians Intervene in Accounting Regulation? The Role of Ideology and Special Interests," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(3), pages 589-642, June.
    3. Christensen, Hans B. & Liu, Lisa Yao & Maffett, Mark, 2020. "Proactive financial reporting enforcement and shareholder wealth," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    4. Miguel Duro & Jonas Heese & Gaizka Ormazabal, 2019. "The effect of enforcement transparency: Evidence from SEC comment-letter reviews," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 780-823, September.
    5. Thompson, Anne M., 2022. "Political connections and the SEC confidential treatment process," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    6. Pantic, B., 2016. "Comparability of financial reports: A literature review of most recent studies," Working Papers 6451, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    7. Heese, Jonas & Khan, Mozaffar & Ramanna, Karthik, 2017. "Is the SEC captured? Evidence from comment-letter reviews," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 98-122.
    8. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    9. Badger, Amanda & Li, Siqi & Park, Hyungshin & Park, Sang Hyun, 2025. "The effect of ASC 606 adoption on value relevance of revenues: Early evidence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Hwang, Seokyoun & Sarath, Bharat & Han, Seung-youb, 2022. "Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    11. Oleh Pasko, 2018. "Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 37-46, June.
    12. Anthony D. Miller & David Oldroyd, 2018. "An Economics Perspective on Financial Reporting Objectives," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 104-108, March.
    13. Matthew Kubic, 2025. "The benefits of article 11 pro forma disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2768-2821, September.
    14. Anna Białek-Jaworska & Paulina Szymanek, 2025. "Investors’ reaction to banning IFRS use by domestic firms in alternative market," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(2), pages 355-408, June.
    15. David B. Sutton & Carolyn J. Cordery & Tony Zijl, 2015. "The Purpose of Financial Reporting: The Case for Coherence in the Conceptual Framework and Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 116-141, March.
    16. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    17. Nellija Titova & Maris Freifalts, 2019. "The Progress And Advancement Of The Business Performance Measurement Research," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 13(1), pages 196-208.
    18. Henry Jarva, 2014. "Economic consequences of SFAS 142 goodwill write-offs," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(1), pages 211-235, March.
    19. Yu‐Feng Hsu & Wei‐Po Lee, 2020. "Evaluation of the going‐concern status for companies: An ensemble framework‐based model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 687-706, July.
    20. Steve Lin & Grace Pownall & Assma Sawani & Changjiang Wang, 2025. "The effect of the FASB-IASB convergence project on the rules- and principles-based nature of US GAAP and IFRS," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1500-1542, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:22-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-accounting-regulation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.