IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v5y2018icp133-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On slowdown variance as a measure of fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Maccio, Vincent J.
  • Hogg, Jenell
  • Down, Douglas G.

Abstract

When considering fairness one must ask two fundamental questions. Firstly, what does it mean to be fair? And secondly, how does one measure that fairness? Different authors have offered different notions and metrics to address these questions. We provide arguments identifying where past metrics fall short, discuss how the underlying motivations differ, and offer our own metric to address these issues. That is, we propose using a system’s slowdown variance (SDV) as a measure for its fairness. Advantages of SDV are demonstrated via a suite of simulation experiments which compare a range of established policies under a range of service time distributions. These advantages include a decoupling of fairness from performance, an intuitive distinction between last come first serve and processor sharing, as well as recognition of starvation within shortest remaining processing time.

Suggested Citation

  • Maccio, Vincent J. & Hogg, Jenell & Down, Douglas G., 2018. "On slowdown variance as a measure of fairness," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 133-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:5:y:2018:i:c:p:133-144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2018.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716018300071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2018.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:5:y:2018:i:c:p:133-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.