IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v16y2026ics221471602600014x.html

Simple Group Choice: A minimal-information multi-criteria group decision aiding approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, River

Abstract

In many real group decision-making problems, decisions must be made with limited data and busy Decision Makers (DMs). In such settings, asking for detailed scores or trade-off weights can be unrealistic and can obscure, rather than clarify, how a recommendation emerges. We propose Simple Group Choice (SGC), a deliberately lightweight approach to multi-criteria group choice that relies only on two sets of binary questions. SGC then aggregates by simple counting: wins on a criterion are weighted by how many people consider that criterion key and are summed across the group. The result is a transparent support score for each alternative and a top choice set, accompanied by compact diagnostics that help interpret and screen. Because incomplete answers are common, we extend SGC to uncertainty by treating missing entries as unknown binary bits and examining all feasible completions. This yields clear, robust recommendations without introducing parametric assumptions. A didactic urban-logistics study illustrates the approach under complete information and under uncertainty. Overall, SGC offers a practical, explainable, and low-burden tool for contexts like shortlisting in early-phase group decisions, and a natural front end to more detailed analyses when needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, River, 2026. "Simple Group Choice: A minimal-information multi-criteria group decision aiding approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:16:y:2026:i:c:s221471602600014x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2026.100390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471602600014X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2026.100390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:16:y:2026:i:c:s221471602600014x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.