Author
Listed:
- Parkin, Jane
- Wrigley, David
- Petrovic, Sanja
- Akbari, Vahid
Abstract
The staff rostering problem has attracted interest of researchers for decades with the aim to minimise cost or maximise customer service. However, although some studies have incorporated modelling of well-being related constraints such as working hours legislation, and isolated aspects related to staff fatigue, preferences, or workload, the explicit and joint integration of multiple occupational health–based well-being measures into cyclic shift design and rostering remains largely unexplored. Conversely, numerous studies, particularly in the field of occupational medicine, have explored the impact of shift work on the health and well-being of staff. In our study, we consider a real-world call-centre, which must provide 24/7 service by staff who work cyclic shifts. We develop a model for cyclic shift design, which determines optimal start of shifts and their durations and generates work schedules to meet the given demand for service. The main research contribution of this study is the inclusion of the concept of staff well-being: Fatigue Index, work-life balance measures, and deviations from Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidelines. Our criteria for assessing the merit of a roster involve defining objectives related to efficiency, effectiveness, and well-being. Upon comparing our findings with the manually crafted call-centre roster, we ascertain that it is feasible to enhance staff well-being without compromising the efficiency and effectiveness of the roster.
Suggested Citation
Parkin, Jane & Wrigley, David & Petrovic, Sanja & Akbari, Vahid, 2026.
"Shift scheduling in a call-centre considering staff well-being: a case study,"
Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:16:y:2026:i:c:s2214716026000060
DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2026.100382
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:16:y:2026:i:c:s2214716026000060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.