Author
Listed:
- Mizuno, Shinya
- Ohba, Haruka
Abstract
This study proposes a novel disaster risk assessment model for quantitatively evaluating structural vulnerabilities and evacuation difficulties in evacuation networks. First, we probabilistically model accessibility relationships between evacuation nodes using a gravity model based on the distribution of evacuees and shelters, formulating this as a discrete-time Markov chain. Subsequently, we extract equivalence classes based on strongly connected components and derive stationary distributions for the main equivalence class to visualize isolated areas and risk concentration within the evacuation network. For nodes not belonging to the main equivalence class, we calculate the number and locations of newly required evacuation support facilities using the minimum covering problem. Based on this structural information, we define a disaster risk score composed of the number of equivalence classes, covering circles, and the standard deviation of the stationary distribution. Through multiple simulations using virtual terrain, we confirm the consistency and reproducibility of the proposed method. Furthermore, through empirical analysis targeting 16 municipalities in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan — a region characterized by coastal lowlands and mountainous terrain — we reveal elevation-dependent network disconnections and evacuation destination bias risks in coastal areas. The analysis demonstrates how topographical constraints significantly impact evacuation network connectivity, with coastal municipalities showing rapid risk score increases when elevation thresholds exceed 10 meters, while inland mountainous areas maintain relatively stable connectivity. This method serves as a novel disaster risk visualization approach that comprehensively evaluates spatial and structural factors, contributing to the assessment of evacuation shelter placement adequacy, proposals for complementary facilities, and prioritization of regional disaster prevention policies.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:16:y:2026:i:c:s2214716026000059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.