IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v14y2025ics2214716025000144.html

Deep reinforcement learning approach for real-time airport gate assignment

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Haonan
  • Wu, Xu
  • Ribeiro, Marta
  • Santos, Bruno
  • Zheng, Pan

Abstract

Assigning aircraft to gates is one of the most important daily decision problems that airport professionals face. The solution to this problem has raised a significant effort, with many researchers tackling many different variants of this problem. However, most existing studies on gate assignment contain only a static perspective without considering possible future disruptions and uncertainties. We bridge this gap by looking at gate assignments as a dynamic decision-making process. This paper presents the Real-time Gate Assignment Problem Solution (REGAPS) algorithm, an innovative method adept at resolving pre-assignment issues and dynamically optimizing gate assignments in real-time at airports through the integration of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). This work represents the first time that DRL is used with real airport data and a configuration containing a large number of flights and gates. The methodology combines a tailored Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation with the Asynchronous Advantage Actor–Critic (A3C) architecture. Multiple factors, such as flight schedules, gate availability, and passenger walking time, are considered. An empirical case study demonstrates that the REGAPS outperforms two classic deep Q-learning algorithms and a traditional Genetic Algorithm in terms of reducing passenger walking time and apron gate assignment. Finally, supplementary experiments highlight REGAPS’s adaptability under various gate assignment rules for international and domestic flights. The finding demonstrates that not only did REGAPS outperform COVID restrictions, but it can also produce considerable benefits under other policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Haonan & Wu, Xu & Ribeiro, Marta & Santos, Bruno & Zheng, Pan, 2025. "Deep reinforcement learning approach for real-time airport gate assignment," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716025000144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. S. Mangoubi & Dennis F. X. Mathaisel, 1985. "Optimizing Gate Assignments at Airport Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 173-188, May.
    2. Ying, Cheng-shuo & Chow, Andy H.F. & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "An actor-critic deep reinforcement learning approach for metro train scheduling with rolling stock circulation under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 210-235.
    3. Jiang, Yu & Wang, Yasha & Hu, Zhitao & Xue, Qingwen & Yu, Bin, 2023. "Airport gate assignment problem with harbor constraints based on Branch-and-Price algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Daş, Gülesin Sena & Gzara, Fatma & Stützle, Thomas, 2020. "A review on airport gate assignment problems: Single versus multi objective approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Li, Mingjie & Hao, Jin-Kao & Wu, Qinghua, 2022. "Learning-driven feasible and infeasible tabu search for airport gate assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 172-186.
    6. A Bolat, 1999. "Assigning arriving flights at an airport to the available gates," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(1), pages 23-34, January.
    7. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    8. Haghani, Ali & Chen, Min-Ching, 1998. "Optimizing gate assignments at airport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 437-454, August.
    9. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2007. "A heuristic approach for airport gate assignments for stochastic flight delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 547-567, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Hongkun & Gao, Xiaoxia & Xu, Zongyuan & Xiao, Huan & Gao, Yihan & Zhang, Huanqiang & Ma, Hongyu & Zhu, Yuting & Zhu, Xiaoxun & Wang, Yu, 2025. "Wind direction prediction combined with wind speed in a wind farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    2. Zhang, Zeguo & Yin, Jianchuan, 2025. "Incremental principal component analysis based depthwise separable Unet model for complex wind system forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    3. Yang, Zhixin & Che, Jinxing, 2025. "A two stage feature extraction and synchronized feature–parameter learning framework for reliable multistep wind speed forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    4. Kadyrov, Shirali & Azamov, Azamkhon & Abdumajitov, Yelbek & Turan, Cemil, 2025. "Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic vehicle routing with demand and traffic uncertainty," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Mingjie & Hao, Jin-Kao & Wu, Qinghua, 2022. "Learning-driven feasible and infeasible tabu search for airport gate assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 172-186.
    2. Daş, Gülesin Sena & Gzara, Fatma & Stützle, Thomas, 2020. "A review on airport gate assignment problems: Single versus multi objective approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Karsu, Özlem & Azizoğlu, Meral & Alanlı, Kerem, 2021. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the airport gate assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Zhang, Dong & Klabjan, Diego, 2017. "Optimization for gate re-assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 260-284.
    5. Xu, Liang & Zhang, Chao & Xiao, Feng & Wang, Fan, 2017. "A robust approach to airport gate assignment with a solution-dependent uncertainty budget," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 458-478.
    6. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2005. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 584, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    7. Hu, Rong & Wang, Deyun & Feng, Huilin & Zhang, Junfeng & Pan, Xiaoran & Deng, Songwu, 2024. "Joint gate-runway scheduling considering carbon emissions, airport noise and ground-air coordination," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Skorupski, Jacek & Żarów, Piotr, 2021. "Dynamic management of aircraft stand allocation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Şeker, Merve & Noyan, Nilay, 2012. "Stochastic optimization models for the airport gate assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 438-459.
    10. Wandelt, Sebastian & Signori, Andrea & Chang, Shuming & Wang, Shuang & Du, Zhuoming & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2025. "Unleashing the potential of operations research in air transport: A review of applications, methods, and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Guépet, J. & Acuna-Agost, R. & Briant, O. & Gayon, J.P., 2015. "Exact and heuristic approaches to the airport stand allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 597-608.
    12. Amadeo Ascó, 2016. "An Analysis of Robustness Approaches for the Airport Baggage Sorting Station Assignment Problem," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-19, September.
    13. Dorndorf, Ulrich & Drexl, Andreas & Nikulin, Yury & Pesch, Erwin, 2007. "Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 326-334, June.
    14. Gülesin Sena Daş & Fatma Gzara, 2024. "Column generation based solution for bi-objective gate assignment problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 100(1), pages 123-151, August.
    15. Silva, João & Kalakou, Sofia & Andrade, Antonio R., 2023. "Maximizing non-aeronautical revenues in airport terminals using gate assignment and passenger behaviour modelling," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Wang, Ning & Li, Manyu & Zhao, Annan & Chen, Maolin, 2026. "Integrated optimization of airport slot allocation and boarding gate assignment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Su, Z.C. & Chow, Andy H.F. & Fang, C.L. & Liang, E.M. & Zhong, R.X., 2023. "Hierarchical control for stochastic network traffic with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 196-216.
    18. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2007. "A heuristic approach for airport gate assignments for stochastic flight delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 547-567, July.
    19. Bagamanova, Margarita & Mota, Miguel Mujica, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization with a delay-aware component for airport stand allocation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Bert Dijk & Bruno F. Santos & Joao P. Pita, 2019. "The recoverable robust stand allocation problem: a GRU airport case study," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 615-639, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.