IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v14y2025ics221471602500003x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholder privacy management in the AIGC model

Author

Listed:
  • Lv, Yali
  • Yang, Jian
  • Sun, Xiaoning
  • Wu, Huafei

Abstract

The technological development powered by Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) models, exemplified by Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), has completely transformed machine language processing and fostered substantial technological advancements. However, their extensive deployment has amplified concerns regarding data privacy risks, which are attributed not only to technological vulnerabilities but also to the intricate conflicts of interest among model providers, application service providers, and privacy regulators. To tackle this challenge, this research develops a tripartite evolutionary game model that examines the strategic interactions and dynamic relationships among large language model providers, application service providers, and privacy regulatory agencies. By employing replicator dynamic equations and Jacobian matrices, the research investigates the stability of strategic equilibria and simulates optimal adjustment paths across diverse policy scenarios. Drawing on the research findings, this paper offers practical recommendations to strengthen data privacy protection in large language models, delivering a solid theoretical foundation for policymakers and industry practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Lv, Yali & Yang, Jian & Sun, Xiaoning & Wu, Huafei, 2025. "Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholder privacy management in the AIGC model," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s221471602500003x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471602500003X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s221471602500003x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.