IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v14y2025ics2214716025000016.html

Cooperation and competition in an oligopolistic and mature industry: A case study on the cationic reagent industry based on an optimization model

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Joohang
  • Choi, Byoungil
  • Lim, Chaehong
  • Eun, Joonyup

Abstract

A cationic reagent is an essential raw material in printing paper production. The market environment of the cationic reagent industry is influenced by the printing paper industry. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the global expansion of remote work and home education has decreased the demand for printing papers. Consequently, competition among market players (i.e., suppliers and buyers) in the cationic reagent industry is intensifying. This study focuses on cooperation between market players in the cationic reagent industry, representing a typical oligopolistic and mature industry. It proposes a supply chain optimization model that minimizes the costs of the entire supply chain, incorporating buyers’ risk hedge tendency to address market uncertainty. The model is empirically tested using accessible and reliable data to assess its business applicability. Numerical experiments are conducted to explore scenarios that can occur in real market environment, such as levels of risk hedging, trade disputes, decreases in demand, and changes in production capacity. The experimental results provide managerial implications. As buyers maximize the degree to which they diversify their purchase quantities across multiple suppliers to reduce risks, differential costs of the entire supply chain increase by 19%, which are costs that cannot be reduced by suppliers’ capabilities and inevitably arise due to differences between suppliers (e.g., geography, politics, and government policies). However, in unfavorable market conditions, such as trade disputes and decreases in demand, less competitive suppliers can survive. This study shows that when market demand in the cationic reagent industry decreases, two suppliers may potentially experience operational outages. In reality, these two suppliers deteriorated under the challenging market conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Joohang & Choi, Byoungil & Lim, Chaehong & Eun, Joonyup, 2025. "Cooperation and competition in an oligopolistic and mature industry: A case study on the cationic reagent industry based on an optimization model," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000016
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716025000016
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk & Yeni, Fatma Betül & Gürsoy Yılmaz, Beren & Özçelik, Gökhan, 2023. "An optimization-based methodology equipped with lean tools to strengthen medical supply chain resilience during a pandemic: A case study from Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean, 1988. "Corrigendum to 'A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, III, Cournot Competition' (vol. 31, no. 4)," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1567-1568, September.
    3. Liu, Zugang & Nagurney, Anna, 2011. "Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 539-549, October.
    4. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Nishizaki, Ichiro & Uemura, Yoshio, 2001. "Fuzzy programming and profit and cost allocation for a production and transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Joskow, Paul L, 1975. "Firm Decision-making Processes and Oligopoly Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(2), pages 270-279, May.
    7. Thanh, Phuong Nga & Bostel, Nathalie & Péton, Olivier, 2008. "A dynamic model for facility location in the design of complex supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 678-693, June.
    8. da Cunha, Richard Alex & Rangel, Luís Alberto Duncan & Rudolf, Christian A. & Santos, Luiza dos, 2022. "A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    9. Gökhan Özçelik & Ömer Faruk Yılmaz & Fatma Betül Yeni, 2021. "Robust optimisation for ripple effect on reverse supply chain: an industrial case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 245-264, January.
    10. Yuhan Guo & Fangxia Hu & Hamid Allaoui & Youssef Boulaksil, 2019. "A distributed approximation approach for solving the sustainable supply chain network design problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 3695-3718, June.
    11. Li, Minghao & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2020. "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Brander, James A. & Lewis, Tracy R., 1986. "Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 956-970, December.
    13. Devi R. Gnyawali & Byung‐jin (robert) Park, 2009. "Co‐opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 308-330, July.
    14. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    15. Vidal, Carlos J. & Goetschalckx, Marc, 2001. "A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 134-158, February.
    16. Hassan, Nadir Munir & Abbasi, Muhammad Nauman, 2021. "A review of supply chain integration extents, contingencies and performance : A post Covid-19 review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hart Nibbrig, Maurice & Sharif Azadeh, Shadi & Maknoon, M.Y., 2025. "Adaptive resilience strategies for supply chain networks against disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk & Guan, Yongpei & Yılmaz, Beren Gürsoy & Yeni, Fatma Betül & Özçelik, Gökhan, 2025. "A comprehensive methodology combining machine learning and unified robust stochastic programming for medical supply chain viability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Maleki, Abolfazl & Hemmati, Vahid & Reza Abazari, Seyed & Aghsami, Amir & Rabbani, Masoud, 2024. "Optimal distribution and waste management of Covid-19 vaccines from vaccination centers’ satisfaction perspective – A fuzzy time window-based VRP," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Dmitry Ivanov, 2026. "Collaborative emergency adaptation for ripple effect mitigation in intertwined supply networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(2), pages 1727-1743, April.
    5. Kim, Bosung & Park, Kun Soo & Jung, Se-Youn & Park, Sang Hun, 2018. "Offshoring and outsourcing in a global supply chain: Impact of the arm’s length regulation on transfer pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 88-98.
    6. Liu, Ming & Ding, Yueyu & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Zheng, Feifeng, 2024. "Robust actions for improving supply chain resilience and viability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Kim, Kyoung-Kuk & Park, Kun Soo, 2014. "Transferring and sharing exchange-rate risk in a risk-averse supply chain of a multinational firm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 634-648.
    8. Alikhani, Reza & Ranjbar, Amirhossein & Jamali, Amir & Torabi, S. Ali & Zobel, Christopher W., 2023. "Towards increasing synergistic effects of resilience strategies in supply chain network design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Hammami, R. & Frein, Y., 2014. "Redesign of global supply chains with integration of transfer pricing: Mathematical modeling and managerial insights," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 267-277.
    10. Seyed Ashkan Hosseini Shekarabi & Reza Kiani Mavi & Flavio Romero Macau, 2025. "Supply Chain Resilience: A Critical Review of Risk Mitigation, Robust Optimisation, and Technological Solutions and Future Research Directions," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(3), pages 681-735, September.
    11. Pardis Roozkhosh & Alireza Pooya & Renu Agarwal, 2023. "Blockchain acceptance rate prediction in the resilient supply chain with hybrid system dynamics and machine learning approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 705-725, June.
    12. Lida Safari & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Farzad Movahedi Sobhani, 2024. "Resilient and sustainable supply chain design and planning under supply disruption risk using a multi-objective scenario-based robust optimization model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27485-27527, November.
    13. Wang, Mengyue & Huang, Hongxuan, 2019. "The design of a flexible capital-constrained global supply chain by integrating operational and financial strategies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 40-62.
    14. Liu, Ming & Liu, Zhongzheng & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Chu, Chengbin & Zheng, Feifeng, 2022. "An optimization approach for multi-echelon supply chain viability with disruption risk minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Gökhan Özçelik & Fatma Betül Yeni & Beren Gürsoy Yılmaz & Ömer Faruk Yılmaz, 2025. "A bi-objective robust optimization model to bolster a resilient medical supply chain in case of the ripple effect," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-42, June.
    16. Ming Liu & Yueyu Ding & Maoran Zhu, 2024. "Evaluation of adaptation strategies for sustainable supply chains: application in medical waste reverse supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1126-1139, September.
    17. Michael Baye & Shyh-Fang Ueng, 1999. "Commitment and price competition in a dynamic differentiated-product duopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 41-52, February.
    18. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    19. Wei He & Qian Wang, 2020. "The peer effect of corporate financial decisions around split share structure reform in China," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 474-493, July.
    20. Keay, Ian & Redish, Angela, 2002. "Financial Markets and Twentieth Century Industrialization: Evidence From U.S. and Canadian Steel Producers," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273429, Queen's University - Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.