IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v141y2026ics0165489626000259.html

Two solutions on TU games with preference relations: The core and the globally stable solution

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Mengyu
  • Sun, Hao
  • Yang, Guangjing

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel model of TU games with preference relations to overcome the limitations of the dominance relation, where the preference relation of each coalition is employed to select a set of superior allocations from any payoff vector set. In this framework, the core and the globally stable solution on TU games with preference relations are defined as the intersections of all coalitions’ preferable sets and superior sets, respectively. We propose new properties to characterize the stability of the core and the globally stable solution for this class of games. The core of TU games with C-monotonic preferences, which overcomes the incompleteness of the dominance relation, is shown to be a subset of the core proposed by Gillies for TU games. Addressing the issue caused by the monotonicity of the dominance relation, a necessary and sufficient condition is shown for the non-emptiness and uniqueness of the globally stable solution on TU games with C-single peaked preferences. Moreover, our finding reveals the equivalence of the globally stable solution and the core for this specified game.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Mengyu & Sun, Hao & Yang, Guangjing, 2026. "Two solutions on TU games with preference relations: The core and the globally stable solution," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:141:y:2026:i:c:s0165489626000259
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2026.102518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489626000259
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2026.102518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:141:y:2026:i:c:s0165489626000259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.