IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v140y2026ics0165489626000090.html

Skeptical and credulous belief updating under black box recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Yanagita, Shohei

Abstract

This paper characterizes a simple model of belief updating in response to recommendations from black boxes, recommenders whose information-generating processes are complex and opaque. In particular, we focus on two types of reactions to recommendations. The first is a skeptical response, in which individuals receive recommendations that are highly inconsistent with their prior beliefs and respond skeptically by updating their beliefs conservatively. The second is a credulous response, in which individuals readily accept recommendations that are aligned with their prior beliefs. These two contrasting reactions are jointly captured under the resulting updating rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanagita, Shohei, 2026. "Skeptical and credulous belief updating under black box recommendations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:140:y:2026:i:c:s0165489626000090
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2026.102502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489626000090
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2026.102502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:140:y:2026:i:c:s0165489626000090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.