IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v36y2012i1p11-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of ranching coastal cod (Gadus morhua) compared with on-growing, full-cycle farming and fishing

Author

Listed:
  • Halldórsson, Jón E.
  • Björnsson, Björn
  • Gunnlaugsson, Stefán B.

Abstract

The feasibility of ranching wild cod in 'herds' was compared with three other scenarios: on-growing of wild cod in sea cages, full-cycle cod farming with hatchery produced juveniles, and commercial cod fishery. In the calculations it was assumed that an existing fishing company could either fish, ranch or on-grow 200 tons of cod quota to increase the quota yield or sell it to invest in full-cycle farming. The results indicate ranching to be the most profitable, fishing as the second and on-growing as the third, whereas full-cycle farming appears to be unrewarding. The net present value (NPV) of the four scenarios was [euro]754Â 000, [euro]532Â 000, [euro]198Â 000 and [euro]-95Â 000, respectively. Ranching based on aggregating and growing wild cod in a reserved coastal area with anthropogenic feeding thus has the potential of decreasing the cost of fishing, improving growth rate and enhancing quota yield without the investments required in conventional farming. As cod ranching is in the initial stages of development the risks are higher than in the well established cod fishery.

Suggested Citation

  • Halldórsson, Jón E. & Björnsson, Björn & Gunnlaugsson, Stefán B., 2012. "Feasibility of ranching coastal cod (Gadus morhua) compared with on-growing, full-cycle farming and fishing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 11-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:36:y:2012:i:1:p:11-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X11000510
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:36:y:2012:i:1:p:11-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.