IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v35y2011i4p477-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting baselines in scientific publications: A case study using cetacean research

Author

Listed:
  • Rose, N.A.
  • Janiger, D.
  • Parsons, E.C.M.
  • Stachowitsch, M.

Abstract

The marine sciences have undergone a sequence of historical changes related to new methodologies, approaches and challenges. Most recently, deteriorating natural ecosystems and threatened component species have prompted a renewed change in the focus of scientific research on the marine environment. This study analyzes the scientific literature on cetaceans during the period 2005-2008 to demonstrate that a key focus of modern research is on conservation-related topics, and then compares it to the period 1970-1973 to demonstrate that this new focus represents a shift from basic biological and ecological issues. On average, approximately 46% of papers published on whales, dolphins and porpoises in 2005-2008 were categorized as conservation oriented versus focused on biology or ecology. This contrasts to approximately 10% in 1970-1973. This shift parallels other marine research subjects, such as benthic communities, coral reefs and sea turtles and reflects a general paradigm shift in marine research towards anthropogenic impacts. This is important guidance for institutions and organizations that wish to base their agendas and decisions on state-of-the-art scientific priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose, N.A. & Janiger, D. & Parsons, E.C.M. & Stachowitsch, M., 2011. "Shifting baselines in scientific publications: A case study using cetacean research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 477-482, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:35:y:2011:i:4:p:477-482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(10)00200-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:35:y:2011:i:4:p:477-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.