The best available information--some case studies from NSW, Australia, of conservation-related management responses which impact on recreational fishers
In the state of New South Wales, southeastern Australia, fishing is one of the most popular recreational activities in coastal and freshwater environments. Although a wide variety of fish, crustaceans, molluscs, other invertebrates and algae are exploited by fishers for sport, food and bait, there is little quantitative information on the catches, efforts and effects of humans on populations of these organisms. Although there have been a number of surveys of the activities of recreational fishers in lakes, rivers, estuaries, and more recently the marine environment, there have been few such surveys of the catch, effort, effects and/or motivations of other human user groups such as spearfishers, SCUBA divers, aquarium fish collectors and conservationists. Ideally, fisheries managers use catch and effort data together with information on species biology and human usage to determine management strategies aimed at sharing the fisheries resources in order to maximise the benefits for both present and future generations. Generally, fisheries managers must thus use 'the best available information' and the results of public consultation to make balanced management decisions. In this paper we present case studies on Aquatic Reserves and protected aquatic species which illustrate NSW Fisheries' management responses utilising 'the best available information' and the 'precautionary principle' to protect aquatic habitats and species in NSW waters. We then consider some of the positive and negative impacts that such management strategies may have on users groups. Unfortunately, to date there have been very few examples of the use of 'adaptive management' to test the effectiveness of NSW Fisheries' management decisions, though this would be the ideal approach under most such circumstances.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:261-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.