IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Freeze the tropical seas. An ice-cool prescription for the burning Spratly issues!

Listed author(s):
  • Sun, Kuan-Ming
Registered author(s):

    Recently, the Spratly crisis erupted again. This time, a Sino-Filipino military confrontation took place in the Philippines-claimed area of the archipelago. Although both sides demonstrated a high degree of self-control, the old problem remains and could explode again at any time. The reason for the latest episode is not difficult to understand. Past efforts only touched upon the tip of the iceberg. While calling for shelving of the sovereignty issue, they never indicated how this was to be brought about and very little progress has been made in the negotiations in the past several years. The author submits that the only solution, for the present at least, is the Antarctic formula. Although one might argue that the Antarctic regime, at first sight, does not fit the Spratly situation, the legal foundation of the claims to the Spratlies is comparable to that in the Antarctic case. Moreover, there are no sector claims in the disputed area, which makes the Antarctic approach even more appropriate in the South China Sea.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Marine Policy.

    Volume (Year): 20 (1996)
    Issue (Month): 3 (May)
    Pages: 199-208

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:199-208
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:199-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.