IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v19y1995i4p343-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polar vision or tunnel vision the making of Canadian Arctic waters policy : The making of Canadian Arctic waters policy

Author

Listed:
  • Huebert, Rob

Abstract

This article examined the manner by which Canadian maritime Arctic policy is formulated. It suggests that this policy is largely the result of an ad hoc and reactive process. In general, the policy tends to be the product of a specific event initiated by a non-Canadian actor in the Canadian Arctic. In the early 1970s, this event was the voyages of the American oil tanker, Manhattan. These voyages resulted in the drafting and passage of the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, among other measures, to protect Canadian northern waters. Likewise, in August 1985, the voyage of the American Coast Guard icebreaker, Polar Sea, through the Northwest Passage acted as the defining event for the creation of Canadian Arctic maritime policy in the 1980s. The resulting public attention compelled the Canadian Minister of External Affairs to develop and announce on 10 September 1985, six policy initiatives that were to be the core elements of Canadian maritime Arctic policy for the remainder of the decade. This article will examine how and why these policies were selected and will then assess the government's efforts to implement them. In doing so, it will provide insight regarding how Canada creates its maritime Arctic policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huebert, Rob, 1995. "Polar vision or tunnel vision the making of Canadian Arctic waters policy : The making of Canadian Arctic waters policy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 343-363, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:343-363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308-597X(95)00011-T
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly Daniels & Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2017. "Bones of democratic contention: Maritime disputes," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 293-310, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:343-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.