IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v82y2019icp709-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and identification of abandoned agricultural land using remote sensing methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Suziedelyte Visockiene, J.
  • Tumeliene, E.
  • Maliene, V.

Abstract

The management of abandoned agricultural land as well as their effective use are relevant for any country to a greater or lesser extent. An attempt to tackle the problems of ineffective utilization of abandoned agricultural land is made in Lithuania and elsewhere. While analyzing the issues related to abandoned agricultural land, a clear definition of an abandoned area is important to perceive as well as potential methods for the identification of such areas are needed to analyse. Also, in order to suggest an effective utilisation of abandoned agricultural land for sustainable land use in the country, the analysis and statistics of such land is important to undertake.

Suggested Citation

  • Suziedelyte Visockiene, J. & Tumeliene, E. & Maliene, V., 2019. "Analysis and identification of abandoned agricultural land using remote sensing methodology," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 709-715.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:709-715
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718303041
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chi, Yuan & Liu, Dahai & Wang, Jing & Wang, Enkang, 2020. "Human negative, positive, and net influences on an estuarine area with intensive human activity based on land covers and ecological indices: An empirical study in Chongming Island, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Movahedi, Reza & Jawanmardi, Sina & Azadi, Hossein & Goli, Imaneh & Viira, Ants-Hannes & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Why do farmers abandon agricultural lands? The case of Western Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. De Yu & Shougeng Hu & Luyi Tong & Cong Xia, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cultivated Land and Its Influences on Grain Production Potential in Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Sowińska-Świerkosz, Barbara & Soszyński, Dawid, 2022. "Spatial indicators as a tool to support the decision-making process in relation to different goals of rural planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Jūratė Sužiedelytė Visockienė & Eglė Tumelienė & Vida Maliene, 2020. "Identification of Heracleum sosnowskyi -Invaded Land Using Earth Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Subedi, Yuba Raj & Kristiansen, Paul & Cacho, Oscar, 2022. "Reutilising abandoned cropland in the Hill agroecological region of Nepal: Options and farmers’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Anny Mulyani & Budi Mulyanto & Baba Barus & Dyah Retno Panuju & Husnain, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis of Abandoned Lands Based on Agroecosystems: The Distribution and Land Suitability for Agricultural Land Development in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Yingqian Huang & Fengqin Li & Hualin Xie, 2020. "A Scientometrics Review on Farmland Abandonment Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Ingrid Belčáková & Branislav Olah & Martina Slámová & Zuzana Pšenáková, 2021. "A Cultural and Environmental Assessment of a Landscape Archetype with Dispersed Settlements in Čadca Cadastral District, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:709-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.