Author
Listed:
- Reyes, René
- Vergara-Asenjo, Gerardo
- Aedo, Yessenia
Abstract
Livestock browsing is a significant driver of forest degradation, with major ecological consequences. In Chile, high livestock stocking densities (LSD) negatively impact on forests, yet their social determinants remain poorly understood. Based on 100 farms that are part of the National Forest Inventory Dataset (farm-level socioeconomic and biophysical data measured in both 2016 and 2022), semi-structured interviews and forest plots (species, sizes, health, and regeneration plots) were performed to evaluate the impact of livestock on forests, understand its socioeconomic drivers, and propose policies to better regulate this activity. We observed that livestock production was stable between 2016 and 2022, despite the huge impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on productive systems. LSD decreased when the importance of off-farm incomes increased. Forest cover was also relevant, as LSD increased in larger and more deforested farms. It means deforestation exacerbates animal load and its negative impacts on the remnant forest fragments. A high LSD decreases seedling and sapling abundance, and increases damage on them, even in farms with supplementary fodder supply. We also observed a significant correlation between damage on tree regeneration and low-quality adult-trees (shape, health and diversity), which exposes past impacts of livestock on forests. As livestock is stable along time, this correlation shows how livestock has been degrading previous tree-cohorts and modifying forest dynamic in a silent process, which exposes how important regulating animal load is for the future of Chilean forests. Finally, we develop several policy proposals to better regulate livestock and its negative impacts.
Suggested Citation
Reyes, René & Vergara-Asenjo, Gerardo & Aedo, Yessenia, 2026.
"Socioeconomic drivers of livestock browsing, and its impact on Chilean forests,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003753
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108291
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.