IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v171y2026ics0264837726003674.html

Can the ecological transition of cropland use narrow rural-urban income inequality? Evidence from China’s Huang-Huai-Hai Region

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Linpeng
  • Liu, Yansui
  • Ou, Cong
  • Li, Yurui

Abstract

Rural-urban income inequality (RUIE) remains a persistent challenge across many rapidly developing regions, undermining socio-economic welfare and hindering sustainable development. The ecological transition of cropland use (ETCU), a management paradigm rooted in the principles of sustainable intensification, is widely advocated to enhance agricultural sustainability. While localized case studies suggest that such practices can bolster rural incomes through improved resource efficiency or product diversification, robust empirical evidence on whether large‑scale ETCU adoption mitigates regional RUIE remains scarce, and the underlying systemic mechanisms are poorly understood. This study develops a multi-scale "cropland-agriculture-rural" framework to analyze how ETCU influences RUIE in China's intensively cultivated Huang-Huai-Hai Region. By integrating plot-scale biogeochemical modeling (PEST-DNDC), county-level panel data (2000–2020), and Structural Equation Modeling, we systematically quantify the spatiotemporal patterns and causal pathways of this transition. The results demonstrate that: (1) ETCU and RUIE exhibit spatially heterogeneous co-evolution; improvements in ETCU are not consistently associated with reduced inequality, and in some coastal counties, they even coincide with widening gaps. (2) ETCU affects RUIE primarily by restructuring agricultural multifunctionality, which serves as the core mediator. (3) The effects are highly dimension-specific. Enhancing resource-use efficiency exerts a modest yet significant direct mitigating effect on RUIE. Conversely, improvements in productivity and environmental performance exhibit no direct effect; instead, they indirectly exacerbate inequality by weakening the agricultural product supply function—which our model identifies as a strong and direct suppressor of RUIE. The economic value-added and ecological conservation functions do not exhibit significant direct equalizing effects. These findings indicate that the equity outcomes of ETCU are not automatic but depend critically on how it reshapes the multifunctional structure of agriculture. Policy interventions must therefore adopt an integrated approach that strategically guides the agricultural transition toward balanced multifunctionality, safeguards diversified production, and ensures that efficiency gains translate into broadly shared benefits for both rural and urban households.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Linpeng & Liu, Yansui & Ou, Cong & Li, Yurui, 2026. "Can the ecological transition of cropland use narrow rural-urban income inequality? Evidence from China’s Huang-Huai-Hai Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003674
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726003674
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.