Author
Listed:
- Tian, Yasi
- Zhang, Yice
- Zhang, Yan
Abstract
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires mechanisms that translate global objectives into context-sensitive local policies. Land consolidation connects land governance, spatial planning, and sustainable development, yet systematic frameworks for evaluating its alignment with the SDGs remain limited. Guided by Fit-for-Purpose (FFP) principles, this study develops an SDG-oriented framework based on the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index. It first applies content analysis to extract land-consolidation measures from a national policy. It then establishes a multidimensional mapping between policy measures and SDG targets through expert consultation, constructing an indicator system covering social, economic, ecological, spatial, and managerial dimensions. Differentiated weights based on provincial development orientations and indicators of local policy innovation are incorporated to reflect the FFP principles of purpose-driven, fit-to-context, inclusiveness, and flexibility. Using 26 provincial-level administrative units in mainland China as empirical cases, the results reveal significant interprovincial variation in SDG alignment. Spatial and managerial dimensions performed strongly, while the social dimension showed a relatively high mean but considerable variation. Economic alignment was weaker, and the ecological dimension recorded the lowest mean and greatest variation. Cluster analysis identifies three policy types, including institution-led, spatial and social response-dominant, and multi-dimensional synergistic advancement. This study extends FFP from project suitability assessment to SDG-oriented policy text analysis and proposes a transferable evaluation paradigm for land governance and broader spatial planning research.
Suggested Citation
Tian, Yasi & Zhang, Yice & Zhang, Yan, 2026.
"Assessing the alignment of land consolidation policies with the Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600342x
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108258
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600342x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.