Author
Abstract
Rural industrial transfer has increasingly reshaped land-use patterns and environmental burdens in China’s countryside, yet its implications for agricultural productivity remain insufficiently understood. Guided by an extended agricultural household framework, this study examines whether the presence of highly polluting industries near rural villages is associated with changes in agricultural total factor productivity (TFP). Using panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we employ a difference-in-differences framework based on the reported presence of highly polluting industries within 5 km of villages. The results indicate that the emergence of nearby highly polluting industries is associated with an approximately 23% decline in agricultural household TFP. A series of robustness checks, matching analyses, and placebo exercises suggest that the negative association remains relatively stable across alternative empirical specifications. Additional analyses provide supplementary evidence broadly consistent with pollution-related channels, partly through reduced labor quality, although the available data do not allow direct observation of pollutant exposure or definitive identification of specific mechanisms. We further find substantial heterogeneity across locations and village structures: the negative association is stronger in villages located farther from provincial or county capitals and weaker in villages with higher concentrations of large surnames. These findings highlight the potentially uneven environmental costs of rural industrialization and underscore the importance of land-use governance, industrial siting regulation, and rural environmental protection for sustainable agricultural development.
Suggested Citation
Luo, Sixuan, 2026.
"Grey fields in rural China: Industrial pollution and agricultural productivity losses,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003418
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108257
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.