Author
Listed:
- Rüber, Kara
- Bodum, Lars
- Elliot, Thomas
Abstract
Ensuring the provision of and access to ecosystem services is crucial to environmental health and human well-being. This study assesses the potential of urban green corridors (UGCs) to accommodate diverse interests, including by supplying ecosystem services, highlighting emerging socio-ecological conflicts. Five global UGCs are analysed as case studies through an ecosystem service assessment. A mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology is applied. The role of local communities is explored in context with the ecosystem service results. The key findings indicate that multiple ecosystem services such as local climate regulation, air quality regulation, flood protection, pollination, and recreational and aesthetic values can be supplied by these UGCs, while some provide educational and scientific research opportunities. However, the UGCs vary in their potential supply of ecosystem services due to unique case-specific characteristics. Achieving a balance between ecological and societal needs remains challenging due to conflicting interests, while infrastructure is often being prioritised, resulting in critical ecological impacts. Limited financial resources, expertise, and stakeholder collaboration challenge the long-term management of UGCs that impacts the supply of ecosystem services. The public's use of these spaces can result in disturbances and conflicts impacting the supply of ecosystem services. UGCs have the potential to serve as multifunctional spaces that address societal needs by providing ecosystem services and other benefits, such as connectivity and supporting social interaction and active mobility. However, further site-specific research is needed to investigate and enhance the supply of ecosystem services, including interactions between ecosystem services.
Suggested Citation
Rüber, Kara & Bodum, Lars & Elliot, Thomas, 2026.
"Ecosystem services supplied by urban green corridors with varying degrees of community involvement,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003352
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108251
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:171:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.