IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v170y2026ics0264837726003078.html

Land decentralization and grain production: Evidence from Chinese counties

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Hongqi
  • Liu, Weiyi

Abstract

Land decentralization is a major component of China’s land governance reforms, but its implications for food security remain unclear. Using panel data from 1659 Chinese counties from 2003 to 2018, this study applies a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine its effect on grain production. The results show that land decentralization significantly reduces county-level grain output, with stronger effects in urban agglomerations and major grain-producing regions. Mechanism analysis shows that land decentralization expands construction land, reduces cultivated land, and limits the scale of grain cultivation. It also worsens cultivated land production conditions and lowers grain yield per unit area, especially in areas with more rugged terrain. These findings suggest that, under the cultivated land requisition-compensation balance system, some areas may replace high-quality farmland with lower-quality land, which can reduce cultivated land productivity. The study reveals a potential conflict between local development autonomy and food security in the context of rapid urbanization. It also provides empirical evidence for sustainable land management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Hongqi & Liu, Weiyi, 2026. "Land decentralization and grain production: Evidence from Chinese counties," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726003078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726003078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.