Author
Abstract
Agricultural expansion in Ghana continues to drive deforestation, posing a major challenge to balancing food production with forest carbon conservation. While Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (SAI) is widely promoted, its ecological and land use planning implications remain underexplored in policy contexts. This study investigates the trade-offs between agricultural intensification and forest carbon conservation, aiming to identify land use configurations that optimise both productivity and environmental sustainability within Ghana’s national planning framework. Using a 31-year FAOSTAT dataset, a socio-ecological systems approach integrating Random Forest and polynomial regression models was applied to capture non-linear dynamics. A multi-objective optimisation framework was used to derive Pareto-optimal land use allocations under empirical constraints, reflecting real-world policy and adoption limitations. Findings reveal that land use composition – particularly the cropland-pasture balance – has a stronger influence on forest carbon stocks than intensification alone. Low adoption rates of irrigation and organic farming limit their national impact. The optimal land use mix (58.85% cropland, 41.15% pasture, 1% organic, 3.01% irrigated) achieves 92% of a composite objective prioritising productivity (70%) and carbon conservation (30%). These results underscore the need for spatially differentiated land use policies that incorporate zoning, targeted incentives, and coordinated landscape governance. The study shows that the ecological impacts of intensification depend on its scale, type, and socio-ecological context. For policymakers, this highlights the need to move beyond uniform SAI approaches toward spatially targeted strategies that integrate land-use zoning, practice-specific incentives, and coordinated landscape management to balance agricultural productivity with forest conservation.
Suggested Citation
Tabiri, Kwaku Asuako, 2026.
"Productivity-carbon trade-offs in Ghana: Quantifying the roles of irrigation and organic farming in land-use optimisation,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600298x
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108214
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600298x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.