Author
Listed:
- Prados, Yana
- Jan, Skaloš
- Azadi, Hossein
Abstract
Urban development is perceived as an indicator of economic advancement and opportunity. However, rapid BUA expansion exerts land pressure, acting as a catalyst for land-use and land-cover (LULC) changes. This study examined the role of socio-environmental factors, including landscape types (LTs), geomorphology and topography, in BUA dynamics and LULC changes across urban, peri-urban and rural areas between 1842 and 2019. The spatial analysis for sixty randomly selected study sites (a total of 24,000 ha), located in the Central European region, employed ArcGIS tools, integrating historical cadastral maps (Stable Cadastre, 1842) with CORINE LULC data (2019), and statistical techniques, including Binomial Logistic Regression. Findings revealed that total BUA increased by 84.7%, mainly in warm lowlands, primarily replacing arable land (67.23% of the total LULC changes). The built-up growth encompassed a mixed-sized building ranging from 4 to 32,488 m2 per unit through infill and edge expansion in urban areas (100–500 m distance from the historical built‑up fabric), and small-sized, clustered (0–50 m distance) BUA expansion around rural settlement cores. The Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) of recent BUA shows predominant clustering of large-sized buildings in the lowlands, which together account for 33.15%. Population density across 4–11 categories emerged as the most influential predictor. The study demonstrated that the socio-ecological factors act as opportunities (uniform topography of warm lowlands) and constraints (complex topography of cold highlands) for BUA expansion. From a land‑use policy perspective, the study prioritises spatially adaptive, ecologically integrated land‑use governance and restoration strategies in response to accelerating socio‑environmental change.
Suggested Citation
Prados, Yana & Jan, Skaloš & Azadi, Hossein, 2026.
"Mapping socio-ecological factors, built-up expansion and land use change: Spatial analysis and insights for planning and restoration,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002784
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108194
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.