Author
Listed:
- Sardaro, Ruggiero
- La Sala, Piermichele
Abstract
In contexts characterized by agricultural specialization and environmental pressures, varietal choices are not simply agronomic decisions, but shape land management and the transformation of rural landscapes. Therefore, the study aims to assess producers’ attitudes toward the use of local varieties and to forecast their rate of diffusion over space and time. This allows an analysis of the temporal dynamics associated with land-use transitions. The research analyses the case of Apulia, i.e. Italy’s second-largest region in terms of vineyard area, through a combined approach. On the one hand, discrete choice experiments investigate the attitudes of producers towards landraces for sparkling wine production. On the other, the Bass diffusion model predicts the temporal trend of adoption and distinguishes between innovators and imitators. The Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE) results identify four types of producers with different preferences and Willingness To Accept (WTA) levels, which range from 2500 € ha−1 to 11,400 € ha−1. The Bass model highlights a prevalence of the imitation effect (q = 11.7%) over the innovation effect (p = 2.3%). The adoption curve is characterized by slow initial penetration, acceleration after the tenth year and territorially differentiated diffusion by the thirtieth year (24% of farms). However, the trajectories are rapid in intermediate areas and slow or incomplete in intensive or marginal areas. These trajectories suggest territorially calibrated and time-sensitive land-use policies for land-use transitions, i.e. agricultural zoning and land banks for marginal areas, support for districts and cooperatives in intermediate areas, diversification incentives and supply chain contracts for intensive areas.
Suggested Citation
Sardaro, Ruggiero & La Sala, Piermichele, 2026.
"Forecasting territorially differentiated land-use transitions: Behavioural evidence from discrete choice experiments and diffusion modelling in Southern Italy,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002760
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108192
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.