Author
Listed:
- Fu, Haiyue
- Chen, Xinyi
- Jiang, Penghui
- Fei, Ding
- Liao, Chuan
Abstract
Land consolidation is increasingly recognized as a key instrument for promoting low-carbon land-use transitions. However, its effectiveness varies under different policy orientations, and how to design strategies for whole-region integrated land consolidation remains insufficiently understood. We develop a systematic approach to identify and prioritize land consolidation potential under alternative land-use optimization pathways. Four low-carbon land-use scenarios are constructed for Shenzhen, China, and future land-use configurations are simulated using a multi-objective optimization approach coupled with the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation model. Land consolidation potential into six types, which enables spatial prioritization of consolidation interventions across the whole region. Results reveal strong scenario dependence in land consolidation patterns. High-priority areas are dominated by ecological restoration for carbon sequestration (37.16%) under the carbon emission reduction preference scenario, construction intensive consolidation area (99.54%) under the economic development preference scenario, and ecological protection for carbon sequestration (98.00%) under the ecological protection preference scenario. Under the balanced multi-objective scenario, no high-potential areas are identified; instead, medium-potential zones dominated by ecological protection for carbon sequestration (97.22%) prevail, indicating that ecological land remains critical to overall land-use benefits. The study advances a multifunctional land consolidation framework that links land-use zoning with policy objectives and provides theoretical insights into coordinated land-use optimization and practical implications for differentiated land consolidation strategies in rapidly urbanizing regions.
Suggested Citation
Fu, Haiyue & Chen, Xinyi & Jiang, Penghui & Fei, Ding & Liao, Chuan, 2026.
"Exploring land consolidation solutions towards land use low-carbon transition: Evidence from Shenzhen, China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002565
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108172
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.