Author
Listed:
- Liu, Chenlu
- Zeng, Chen
- Wang, Pengrui
- Chang, Mingyuan
- Yu, Xingzi
- Yu, Ruijing
Abstract
In the context of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, effective land management emerges as a paramount policy priority worldwide for carbon mitigation and low-carbon transitions. Using the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YEB) as a case study, this study systematically explores the mechanisms and heterogeneity of land transfer’s impact on carbon emissions, taking spatial spillover effects into account. The findings reveal that: (1) newly allocated built-up land has a markedly stronger effect on carbon emissions compared to the redevelopment of existing land, primarily due to the conversion of agricultural and forest land and the built-up of new infrastructure. (2) In 2015–2022, there is an increase in land transfers for industrial, public service, and transportation purposes at the outskirts, while residential and commercial land allocations have decreased, particularly in the lower reaches of the YEB. (3) Industrial land transfers have the most substantial impact on carbon emissions, while emissions from residential and commercial land can be mitigated through energy-efficient technologies and green building standards. (4) Land transfer area (LTA) is positively correlated with carbon emissions, while land marketization (LM) shows a negative influence. Significant spatial autocorrelation was also observed, underscoring the complex spatial dynamics at play in land use and carbon emissions. Based on the findings, policy recommendations are proposed on differentiated land supply management system, optimizing land marketization process, ecological and environmental standards and guidelines to mitigate carbon emissions through integrated land resource management across regions.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Chenlu & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Pengrui & Chang, Mingyuan & Yu, Xingzi & Yu, Ruijing, 2026.
"Unraveling the spatial dynamics and mechanism heterogeneity of land transfer on carbon emission: Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002541
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108170
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.