IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v170y2026ics0264837726002231.html

Clarifying overlapping land rights in semi-formal systems: The case of Mailo tenant lands in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Marple-Cantrell, Kate
  • Huntington, Heather
  • Ali, Daniel Ayalew
  • Hilhorst, Thea

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of clarifying overlapping land rights on Mailo land in Central Uganda, contributing to broader debates on property rights and rural development. The study leverages a quasi-experimental design implemented across three districts, where interventions included systematic demarcation of parcel boundaries and land inventories, dissemination of legal knowledge, conflict mediation services, and facilitation of tenant–landlord agreements. Drawing on a panel of Mailo tenants, a large-N tenant survey, and a survey of landlords, we assess how land rights awareness raising shaped institutional clarity (improved documentation and legal awareness), tenure security (reduced conflict and strengthened perceptions of security), and economic behavior (evidence of land market activity). The findings highlight the central role of annual Busuulu (ground rent) payments—functioning simultaneously as a rent obligation and as formal evidence of tenant rights—as a mechanism linking institutional reforms to greater tenure security and market participation. We further identify heterogeneous effects, with distinct patterns for female-headed households and for tenants with kinship ties to landlords on all three outcomes. Taken together, the results provide new evidence on the mechanisms through which property rights interventions shape security and economic activity in rural Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Marple-Cantrell, Kate & Huntington, Heather & Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Hilhorst, Thea, 2026. "Clarifying overlapping land rights in semi-formal systems: The case of Mailo tenant lands in Uganda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.