Author
Listed:
- Zhou, Jia-He
- Kong, Weilong
- Zhang, Zhengfeng
- de Vries, Walter T.
Abstract
Transfer of development rights (TDR) has been widely adopted as a prospective planning instrument to address land use externalities, yet substantial uncertainties arising from diverse stakeholders across the project lifecycle undermine project success. This study introduces judicial big data and proposes an Event-Factor-Process-Stakeholder (EFPS) analytical framework to identify and quantify these uncertainties as explicit risks, and systematically reveal the multidimensional characteristics and underlying transmission pathways of TDR risks in China. Our findings demonstrate that TDR risk events exhibit a persistent nationwide upward trend, with 94.23% driven by multiple concurrent factors among the 24 identified risk factors. Risks permeate all project phases, following a pattern of multi-phase accumulation, concentrated outbreak and subsequent mitigation, with local governments (49.02%) and farmers (41.05%) as primary risk-generating stakeholders. Through probabilistic dependency inference and hierarchical structuring, our study identifies rights holder identification, spatial positioning, zoning regulation and supervision deficiency as four root-cause risk factors that propagate through dual pathways of social imbalance and engineering failure to higher-level factors. Targeted policy recommendations addressing root-cause factors responsible for 74.76% of observed risk events are proposed, centered on refined rights registration, enhanced planning coherence, and a full-cycle multi-stakeholder supervision system. This study advances a structured analytical paradigm for risk research and provides actionable decision support for prioritizing and managing TDR risks.
Suggested Citation
Zhou, Jia-He & Kong, Weilong & Zhang, Zhengfeng & de Vries, Walter T., 2026.
"Judicial big data reveals systemic risks in China’s transfer of development rights,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001833
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108099
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.