IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001766.html

From sectoral silos to policy coherence: Biodiversity integration in EU land-use and climate policies

Author

Listed:
  • Adamescu, Mihai Cristian
  • D’Amato, Dalia
  • Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa
  • Krauze, Kinga
  • Włodarczyk-Marciniak, Renata
  • Cosor, Georgia
  • Bucur, Magdalena
  • Pitzén, Samuli

Abstract

The European Green Deal seeks to embed biodiversity across EU sectoral policies, yet land-use decisions continue to reveal incoherences between ambition and implementation. We assess the degree of biodiversity integration in EU agriculture, forestry, climate, and energy policies using a structured document analysis (objectives–instruments–implementation), an interaction scoring scheme (−1 to +1), an expert workshop with 25 specialists, and three illustrative cases—a wetland restoration area in Romania, renewable-energy expansion in Poland, and forest management in Finland. Results show that forestry and biodiversity strategies are broadly synergistic on paper, especially regarding governance and monitoring, but effectiveness is limited by national economic priorities and non-binding EU competences. Agricultural policies (CAP, Farm to Fork) display target-level synergies yet remain undermined by subsidies and market incentives that promote intensification. Climate and energy measures, while aligned on nature-based adaptation, often generate trade-offs—biomass use, hydropower, and poorly sited solar or wind projects—when biodiversity safeguards are missing. To strengthen policy coherence, we recommend an integrated approach that redirects environmentally harmful subsidies toward measurable habitat outcomes, embeds biodiversity criteria into renewable-energy siting and land-use planning, harmonizes assessment and monitoring tools, and establishes cross-sectoral governance mechanisms—such as a binding coherence test and coordinated data exchange through the forthcoming EU Science Service for Biodiversity. Such measures would align sectoral incentives with ecological objectives, reduce implementation gaps between EU and local levels, and ensure that biodiversity becomes a structural component of Europe’s sustainable land-use transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Adamescu, Mihai Cristian & D’Amato, Dalia & Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa & Krauze, Kinga & Włodarczyk-Marciniak, Renata & Cosor, Georgia & Bucur, Magdalena & Pitzén, Samuli, 2026. "From sectoral silos to policy coherence: Biodiversity integration in EU land-use and climate policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001766
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001766
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalia D'Amato & Alessandra La Notte & Mattia Damiani & Serenella Sala, 2024. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services in business sustainability: Toward systematic, value chain‐wide monitoring that aligns with public accounting," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(5), pages 1030-1044, October.
    2. Giulia Bazzan & Carsten Daugbjerg & Jale Tosun, 2023. "Attaining policy integration through the integration of new policy instruments: The case of the Farm to Fork Strategy," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 803-818, June.
    3. Sravani Bharandev & S. K. Mukul Ali & Sindhu, 2016. "Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: B.S. Sahay & Sumeet Gupta & Vinod Chandra Menon (ed.), Managing Humanitarian Logistics, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 23-31, Springer.
    4. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan & Li, Weiqi, 2016. "Natural gas as vehicle fuel in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 521-533.
    5. Jale Tosun & Achim Lang, 2017. "Policy integration: mapping the different concepts," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 553-570, November.
    6. Subhani Keerthiratne & Richard S. J. Tol, 2017. "Impact of Natural Disasters on Financial Development," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 33-54, June.
    7. Li, C. & van Bergeijk, P.A.G., 2016. "Do natural disasters stimulate international trade?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 622, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    8. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    9. Searchinger, Timothy & Heimlich, Ralph & Houghton, R. A. & Dong, Fengxia & Elobeid, Amani & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Tokgoz, Simla & Hayes, Dermot J. & Yu, Hun-Hsiang, 2008. "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12881, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Eva-Maria Öhlinger & Othmar Manfred Lehner, 2025. "Aligning policy and science: a teleological analysis of biodiversity accounting and accountability under the European Green Deal," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(7), pages 62-97, March.
    11. Paula Kivimaa & Mikael Hildén & Timothy R. Carter & Claire Mosoni & Samuli Pitzén & Marja Helena Sivonen, 2025. "Evaluating policy coherence and integration for adaptation: the case of EU policies and Arctic cross-border climate change impacts," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 59-75, January.
    12. Ken Koyama & Ichiro Kutani & Yanfei Li, 2016. "Joint Study for Liquefied Natural Gas Market," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2015-rpr-11 edited by Ken Koyama & Ichiro Kutani & Yanfei Li, July.
    13. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Natural gas from shale formation: A research profile," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keenan, Rodney J. & Pozza, Greg & Fitzsimons, James A., 2019. "Ecosystem services in environmental policy: Barriers and opportunities for increased adoption," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Sharafian, Amir & Talebian, Hoda & Blomerus, Paul & Herrera, Omar & Mérida, Walter, 2017. "A review of liquefied natural gas refueling station designs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 503-513.
    3. Xue-Ting Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Electric Output in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Rongrong Li & Min Su, 2017. "The Role of Natural Gas and Renewable Energy in Curbing Carbon Emission: Case Study of the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Xiaoping Zhu & Rongrong Li, 2017. "An Analysis of Decoupling and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions from the Transportation Sector in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Koponen, Kati & Soimakallio, Sampo & Kline, Keith L. & Cowie, Annette & Brandão, Miguel, 2018. "Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2271-2280.
    7. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    8. Tonini, Davide & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2017. "Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-309.
    9. Lotze-Campen, Hermann & von Witzke, Harald & Noleppa, Steffen & Schwarz, Gerald, 2015. "Science for food, climate protection and welfare: An economic analysis of plant breeding research in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 79-84.
    10. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    11. Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2011. "Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism," The Energy Journal, , vol. 32(4), pages 27-50, October.
    12. Kriegler, Elmar, 2011. "Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 594-596, July.
    13. Proost, Stef & Van Dender, Kurt, 2012. "Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 77-87.
    14. repec:fpr:ifprib:2012ghienglish is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Baral, Nabin & Rabotyagov, Sergey, 2017. "How much are wood-based cellulosic biofuels worth in the Pacific Northwest? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of local people's willingness to pay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 99-106.
    17. Zhang, Yi & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2018. "The price and income elasticity of China's natural gas demand: A multi-sectoral perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 332-341.
    18. Ilan Noy & Shunsuke Managi & Stephane Hallegatte, 2018. "Economics of Disasters and Climate Change – The Journal’s First Year," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-3, April.
    19. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Baka, Jennifer & Roland-Holst, David, 2009. "Food or fuel? What European farmers can contribute to Europe's transport energy requirements and the Doha Round," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2505-2513, July.
    21. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Hermansen, John E. & Mogensen, Lisbeth, 2010. "Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2561-2571, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.