Author
Listed:
- Han, Shuaishuai
- Li, Wan
- Kwan, Mei-Po
- Sun, Bindong
- Liu, Qianqian
Abstract
Green spaces have been proven to significantly enhance physical and mental health, and optimizing urban layouts is widely recognized as a key strategy to improve the accessibility of such beneficial environments. Based on the data of 450,000 individual questionnaires covering 59 cities nationwide, provided by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China in 2021, this study uses an econometric model to explore the impact of urban compactness on individual green space accessibility and its underlying mechanisms. The findings show that compact urban form exerts a positive impact on green space accessibility, and this positive effect is mainly driven by relatively scattered and sprawling cities rather than already compact ones. The improvement effect of compact development on green space accessibility only has practical significance when the compactness index is ≥ 2. This moderate positive net effect stems from the balance of multiple mechanisms: the positive mediating role of transportation convenience is stronger than that of spatial proximity, while the crowding-out effect on green space scale serves as the primary negative constraint with a more significant impact than density discomfort. Optimizing urban form to improve green space accessibility is crucial for urban air purification, microclimate regulation, and residents' recreational well-being. The research results provide valuable references for policymakers to improve urban spatial structures and advance the construction of green cities.
Suggested Citation
Han, Shuaishuai & Li, Wan & Kwan, Mei-Po & Sun, Bindong & Liu, Qianqian, 2026.
"Compact urban development and green space accessibility: Micro-evidence from Chinese cities,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001602
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108076
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.