IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001596.html

The double-edged impact of inclusive urban land redevelopment in China: Welfare gains and urban disparities

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Linzi
  • Zheng, Yongjie
  • He, Qingsong

Abstract

This study investigates the distributional welfare effects of inclusive Urban Land Redevelopment (ULR) under China’s New-Type Urbanization Plan (NTUP). Constructing a novel Spatial Human Development Index (SHDI) for 279 cities (2010–2020) and integrating micro-level migrant data, we employ System GMM and triple-difference models to uncover a trade-off between aggregate development and spatial equity. We find that the post-2014 policy shift successfully reversed the welfare-reducing effects of earlier ULR, generating aggregate gains. However, these benefits are structurally asymmetric. Developed cities leverage superior institutional capacity to convert industrial and public-service redevelopment into welfare improvements, whereas less-developed cities realize limited returns despite substantial migration inflows. Micro-level analysis reveals that ULR drives skill-differentiated sorting. In developed cities, ULR significantly increases the retention of low-skilled labor while compressing high-skilled wage premiums, thereby narrowing within-city inequality. Conversely, it exacerbates between-city disparities by triggering an outflow of high-skilled workers from less-developed areas. These findings demonstrate that ULR enhances aggregate efficiency while widening regional disparities, necessitating differentiated strategies that pair physical redevelopment with institutional strengthening in lagging regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Linzi & Zheng, Yongjie & He, Qingsong, 2026. "The double-edged impact of inclusive urban land redevelopment in China: Welfare gains and urban disparities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001596
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001596
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.