IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001420.html

Transboundary ecosystem service flows in Central Asia: Enhancing global sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the grain–water-carbon-culture network (GWCCN)

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jiangyue
  • De Maeyer, Philippe
  • de Voorde, Tim Van
  • Chen, Xi
  • Li, Yaoming

Abstract

Transboundary ecosystem service flows (ESFs) are crucial links that connect natural and social systems across regions. With its unique geographical advantages, Central Asia serves as a strategic hub for regional and global connectivity, contributing to trade, cultural exchange, and technological development. This study presents a framework for understanding how ESFs support the achievement of SDGs in 7 transboundary countries and 195 nations globally, with a focus on the cross-border and remote effects of the grain–water–carbon–culture network (GWCCN) in Central Asia. Our findings highlight that water yield and soil conservation services in the Syr Darya and Amu Darya Basins were critical for downstream countries, with Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan relying on upstream flows from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan (30% and 21% deficits, respectively). Grain production was concentrated in Uzbekistan (35% of total flows), whereas carbon storage and habitat quality services were highly concentrated in the Fergana Valley (40% and 70%, respectively). Cross-border spillovers benefit neighboring countries and global regions. Approximately 20 million people rely on Central Asia–China transboundary rivers. Globally, water exports range from 0.3 to 82.17 billion t, grain exports range from 0.003 to 8.52 billion t, tourism and cultural flows attract 43.86 billion visitors, and carbon and habitat quality services cover 0.09–7.53 billion ha. Importantly, the ESFs of Central Asia significantly support SDG achievement, with contribution rates of 80–90% in China and Russia, 40–60% in Iran and Afghanistan, and < 10% in Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia. Globally, the United States, India, and EU countries receive 43%, 36%, and 13–17%, respectively, supporting the SDGs related to food security, climate action, and socioeconomic development. Overall, Central Asia occupies a strategic position in the global ESF network. Its GWCCN-related ESFs are critical for regional and global ecological security, food provision, climate regulation, and SDG advancement, highlighting the need for coordinated management, sustainable utilization, and the promotion of trade, tourism, and cultural industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jiangyue & De Maeyer, Philippe & de Voorde, Tim Van & Chen, Xi & Li, Yaoming, 2026. "Transboundary ecosystem service flows in Central Asia: Enhancing global sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the grain–water-carbon-culture network (GWCCN)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001420
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001420
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.