IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v168y2026ics0264837726001420.html

Transboundary ecosystem service flows in Central Asia: Enhancing global sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the grain–water-carbon-culture network (GWCCN)

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jiangyue
  • De Maeyer, Philippe
  • de Voorde, Tim Van
  • Chen, Xi
  • Li, Yaoming

Abstract

Transboundary ecosystem service flows (ESFs) are crucial links that connect natural and social systems across regions. With its unique geographical advantages, Central Asia serves as a strategic hub for regional and global connectivity, contributing to trade, cultural exchange, and technological development. This study presents a framework for understanding how ESFs support the achievement of SDGs in 7 transboundary countries and 195 nations globally, with a focus on the cross-border and remote effects of the grain–water–carbon–culture network (GWCCN) in Central Asia. Our findings highlight that water yield and soil conservation services in the Syr Darya and Amu Darya Basins were critical for downstream countries, with Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan relying on upstream flows from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan (30% and 21% deficits, respectively). Grain production was concentrated in Uzbekistan (35% of total flows), whereas carbon storage and habitat quality services were highly concentrated in the Fergana Valley (40% and 70%, respectively). Cross-border spillovers benefit neighboring countries and global regions. Approximately 20 million people rely on Central Asia–China transboundary rivers. Globally, water exports range from 0.3 to 82.17 billion t, grain exports range from 0.003 to 8.52 billion t, tourism and cultural flows attract 43.86 billion visitors, and carbon and habitat quality services cover 0.09–7.53 billion ha. Importantly, the ESFs of Central Asia significantly support SDG achievement, with contribution rates of 80–90% in China and Russia, 40–60% in Iran and Afghanistan, and < 10% in Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia. Globally, the United States, India, and EU countries receive 43%, 36%, and 13–17%, respectively, supporting the SDGs related to food security, climate action, and socioeconomic development. Overall, Central Asia occupies a strategic position in the global ESF network. Its GWCCN-related ESFs are critical for regional and global ecological security, food provision, climate regulation, and SDG advancement, highlighting the need for coordinated management, sustainable utilization, and the promotion of trade, tourism, and cultural industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jiangyue & De Maeyer, Philippe & de Voorde, Tim Van & Chen, Xi & Li, Yaoming, 2026. "Transboundary ecosystem service flows in Central Asia: Enhancing global sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the grain–water-carbon-culture network (GWCCN)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001420
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001420
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adie, Bailey Ashton & Amore, Alberto, 2020. "Transnational World Heritage, (meta)governance and implications for tourism: An Italian case," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Krivonos, Ekaterina & Kuhn, Lena, 2019. "Trade and dietary diversity in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Xia, Wenjun & Chen, Xiaohong & Song, Chao & Pérez-Carrera, Alejo, 2022. "Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Bird, Julia & Lebrand, Mathilde & Venables, Anthony J., 2020. "The Belt and Road Initiative: Reshaping economic geography in Central Asia?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Wang, Lijuan & Zheng, Hua & Chen, Yongzhe & Ouyang, Zhiyun & Hu, Xiaofei, 2022. "Systematic review of ecosystem services flow measurement: Main concepts, methods, applications and future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Li, Jiangyue & Chen, Xi & Maeyer, Philippe De & de Voorde, Tim Van & Li, Yaoming, 2025. "Investigating the supply–demand gap of farmland ecosystem services to advance sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    7. Xing, Yingying & Chen, Mengru & Wang, Xiukang, 2025. "Enhancing water use efficiency and fruit quality in jujube cultivation: A review of advanced irrigation techniques and precision management strategies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    8. Schröter, Matthias & Koellner, Thomas & Alkemade, Rob & Arnhold, Sebastian & Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Frank, Karin & Kastner, Thomas & Kissinger, Meidad & Liu, Jianguo & López-Hoffman, , 2018. "Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PB), pages 231-241.
    9. Wang, Xuanxuan & Chen, Yaning & Li, Zhi & Fang, Gonghuan & Wang, Yi, 2020. "Development and utilization of water resources and assessment of water security in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Jones, Sarah K. & Johnson, Justin A. & Brauman, Kate A. & Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca & Fremier, Alexander & Girvetz, Evan & Gordon, Line J. & Kappel, Carrie V. & Mandle, Lisa & Mullig, 2018. "Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 70-82.
    11. Hu, Yanan & Duan, Weili & Zou, Shan & Chen, Yaning & De Maeyer, Philippe & Van de Voorde, Tim & Takara, Kaoru & Kayumba, Patient Mindje & Kurban, Alishir & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2024. "Coupling coordination analysis of the water-food-energy‑carbon nexus for crop production in Central Asia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    12. Han, Shumin & Xin, Ping & Li, Huilong & Yang, Yonghui, 2022. "Evolution of agricultural development and land-water-food nexus in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    13. Scheyvens, Regina & Carr, Anna & Movono, Apisalome & Hughes, Emma & Higgins-Desbiolles, Freya & Mika, Jason Paul, 2021. "Indigenous tourism and the sustainable development goals," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Johnson, Gary W. & Voigt, Brian & Villa, Ferdinando, 2013. "Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 117-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shuyao & Liu, Kai-Di & Zhang, Wentao & Dou, Yuehan & Chen, Yuqing & Zhang, Taiping & Li, Delong, 2024. "An integrated analysis framework of supply, demand, flow, and use to better understand realized ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Zhang, Yan & Tang, Lina & Kasimu, Alimujiang, 2026. "Operationalizing ecosystem service flows in land-use planning: Mitigating ecological risks through dynamic compensation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 516(C).
    3. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Li, Jiangyue & Chen, Xi & Maeyer, Philippe De & de Voorde, Tim Van & Li, Yaoming, 2025. "Investigating the supply–demand gap of farmland ecosystem services to advance sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Xu, Zihan & Xi, Ziliang & Zhang, Shouhong & Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Jiale, 2026. "Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand for extreme precipitation events: optimising gully watershed strategies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Yanru Zhou & Zhe Feng & Kaiji Xu & Kening Wu & Hong Gao & Peijia Liu, 2023. "Ecosystem Service Flow Perspective of Urban Green Land: Spatial Simulation and Driving Factors of Cooling Service Flow," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Shuyao Wu & Kai-Di Liu & Wentao Zhang & Yuehan Dou & Yuqing Chen & Delong Li, 2023. "To better understand realized ecosystem services: An integrated analysis framework of supply, demand, flow and use," Papers 2309.15574, arXiv.org.
    8. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Chen, Haojie, 2025. "How to assess realized ecosystem services: Indicators, challenges in determining actual use, and suggestions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Chalkiadakis, Charis & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Kraak, Menno-Jan, 2022. "Ecosystem service flows: A systematic literature review of marine systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Zhang, Ling & Huang, Qingxu & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Liao, Chuan & Liu, Ziwen & He, Chunyang & Bai, Yansong & Chen, Peiyuan & Zhou, Yuchen & Liu, Yimeng & Bryan, Brett A., 2024. "Measuring virtual flows of ecosystem services embedded in traded goods across an urban agglomeration in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Uta Schirpke & Lukas Egarter Vigl & Erich Tasser & Ulrike Tappeiner, 2019. "Analyzing Spatial Congruencies and Mismatches between Supply, Demand and Flow of Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Xiuli Liu & Rui Xiong & Pibin Guo & Lei Nie & Qinqin Shi & Wentao Li & Jing Cui, 2022. "Virtual Water Flow Pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China: An Analysis Based on a Multiregional Input–Output Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Brück, Maria & Abson, David J. & Fischer, Joern & Schultner, Jannik, 2022. "Broadening the scope of ecosystem services research: Disaggregation as a powerful concept for sustainable natural resource management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Zhang, Liwei & Li, Xupu & Li, Yingjie & Frans, Veronica F. & Yan, Junping, 2020. "A network perspective for mapping freshwater service flows at the watershed scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. Finisdore, John & Rhodes, Charles & Haines-Young, Roy & Maynard, Simone & Wielgus, Jeffrey & Dvarskas, Anthony & Houdet, Joel & Quétier, Fabien & Lamothe, Karl A. & Ding, Helen & Soulard, François & V, 2020. "The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    17. Huang, Qingxu & Yin, Dan & He, Chunyang & Yan, Jubo & Liu, Ziwen & Meng, Shiting & Ren, Qiang & Zhao, Rui & Inostroza, Luis, 2020. "Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    18. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Fu, Bojie & Zhang, Liwei & Wu, Xutong & Li, Yingjie, 2022. "Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Wenbo Cai & Tong Wu & Wei Jiang & Wanting Peng & Yongli Cai, 2020. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply–Demand and Spatial Relationships for Intercity Cooperation: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Wang, Lijuan & Zheng, Hua & Chen, Yongzhe & Ouyang, Zhiyun & Hu, Xiaofei, 2022. "Systematic review of ecosystem services flow measurement: Main concepts, methods, applications and future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:168:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.