IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics026483772600147x.html

Adaptive policy analysis of sustainable and productive agriculture and its context

Author

Listed:
  • Kaklauskas, Arturas
  • Jayasinghe, Guttila
  • Rajib, Shaw
  • Kaklauskiene, Loreta
  • Ubarte, Ieva
  • Naimaviciene, Jurga
  • Naimavicius, Saulius
  • Milevicius, Virginijus

Abstract

According to the World Bank, agriculture can help raise incomes, reduce poverty, and ensure better food security for 80% of the world’s poor, who mostly work in farming and live in rural areas. This study sought to show that rational sustainable and productive agriculture (SPA), and a favorable macro environment can minimize agriculture trade-offs and enhance synergies. This analysis aims to clarify the links between country agriculture and its context, leading to evidence-based recommendations for efficiency and sustainability designed to promote the rational development of SPA. The Performance Model of Sustainable Agriculture of the World (PEMSA model), sub-models, and a map developed in this study revealed that improvements in countries’ political and social indicators lead to improvements in their SPA. Our evidence supports the idea that environmental, political, legal, planning, social, and economic sustainability metrics usually behave in a similar fashion and follow the same general course in their movement. The performance model developed in this study to analyze links between SPA and its macro environment provides evidence-based digital recommendations and strategies that will help to improve SPA; the model explains 99.4% of SPA dispersions. The findings reveal a synergistic effect for SPA (67.7%) through improving a country’s macro environment. Integrated multiple-criteria and statistical analysis was used to simulate global SPA policy by analyzing 1925 scenarios. It can also help to define the best means toward progress sustainable and productive agriculture. The world is full of data, and the amounts are growing; yet, we are still surprisingly in a data shortage for some agricultural actions and processes. Data are inadequate or arrive too late in too many countries, and fail to cover some issues in sufficient detail when available. Decision-makers that face data shortage and completeness problems when working with traditional sources of agriculture data can use Google data to overcome these issues. The developed PEMSAGoogle models have shown sufficient average reliability (R2aver=0.933–0.956). Cost-effective and real-time data on stakeholders' opinions from Google can help decision-makers overcome the data shortage and completeness problems they face when working with traditional sources of agricultural management data.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaklauskas, Arturas & Jayasinghe, Guttila & Rajib, Shaw & Kaklauskiene, Loreta & Ubarte, Ieva & Naimaviciene, Jurga & Naimavicius, Saulius & Milevicius, Virginijus, 2026. "Adaptive policy analysis of sustainable and productive agriculture and its context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600147x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772600147X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600147x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.