IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001468.html

Unveiling Cerrado deforestation: A comparative analysis among Brazilian states

Author

Listed:
  • Barasal Morales, Adriano
  • Laurini, Márcio P.
  • Dou, Yue

Abstract

The Brazilian Cerrado is one of the world’s most threatened tropical savanna biomes, yet the institutional determinants of deforestation across states remain insufficiently understood. While previous research has focused mainly on economic drivers such as agricultural expansion, less attention has been given to subnational environmental governance. In Brazil, licensing and enforcement responsibilities are partly decentralized, generating substantial variation in regulatory frameworks across states. This study examines how these institutional differences are associated with deforestation dynamics in the Cerrado between 2018 and 2023. We combine satellite-based deforestation alerts with georeferenced information on rural properties from the Cadastro Ambiental Rural (CAR) and estimate three complementary models: a spatio-temporal decomposition of deforestation alerts, a land-conversion model for deforested area, and a logit model for clearing within registered rural properties. The results reveal marked cross-state heterogeneity. Persistent upward long-run trends are concentrated in frontier states of the MATOPIBA region, especially Bahia, Maranhão, Tocantins, and Piauí, whereas other states display flatter or more cyclical trajectories. Clearings are systematically larger in states with simplified licensing arrangements, consistent with the view that regulatory flexibility facilitates large-scale land conversion. At the property level, soybean and pasture expansion strongly increase deforestation risk, and when deforestation occurs within CAR-registered properties it tends to involve larger cleared areas. Overall, the findings show that state-level environmental governance is closely associated with where, when, and how deforestation occurs in the Cerrado, underscoring the need for stronger and better-coordinated land-use regulation across Brazilian states.

Suggested Citation

  • Barasal Morales, Adriano & Laurini, Márcio P. & Dou, Yue, 2026. "Unveiling Cerrado deforestation: A comparative analysis among Brazilian states," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001468
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001468
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.